• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚老年男性接受根治性前列腺切除术后的生存结果。

Survival outcomes in elderly men undergoing radical prostatectomy in Australia.

作者信息

Ranasinghe Weranja, Wang Luke L, Persad Raj, Bolton Damien, Lawrentschuk Nathan, Sengupta Shomik

机构信息

Urology Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Urology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2018 Mar;88(3):E189-E193. doi: 10.1111/ans.14166. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1111/ans.14166
PMID:28922686
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the outcomes of patients older than 75 years of age in Victoria undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

METHODS

Data on all men undergoing radical prostatectomy in Victoria between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2014 were obtained from the Victorian Cancer Registry. Tumour characteristics including Gleason grade, stage of disease and cause of death were obtained. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test, Cox proportional hazards method and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 686 men underwent radical prostatectomy during the defined period, with a median follow-up of 58 months. Of these, 332 were men over the age of 75. All parameters are comparisons between patients >75 years of age and men <75 years of age. Men >75 years had a higher proportion of Gleason grade ≥8 disease (16.6% versus 11.4%, P < 0.001) but had similar stage of disease. Men >75 years had lower rates of 5- and 10-year overall survival (67.3% versus 96.3% and 27.7% versus 89.1%) and lower rates of 5- and 10-year prostate cancer-specific survival (96.2% versus 99.3% and 94.3% versus 97.4%), respectively. Age was an independent risk factor for prostate cancer specific and overall mortality on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.32-1.68; P < 0.001 and hazard ratio 4.26, 95% confidence interval 2.15-8.42; P < 0.001), when adjusted for stage and grade.

CONCLUSION

Older men undergoing radical prostatectomy in Victoria had higher-grade disease but similar stage. Age was an independent risk factor for worse prostate cancer-specific and overall survival.

摘要

背景

调查维多利亚州75岁以上男性接受前列腺癌根治术的治疗结果。

方法

从维多利亚癌症登记处获取2004年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间在维多利亚州接受前列腺癌根治术的所有男性的数据。获取肿瘤特征,包括 Gleason 分级、疾病分期和死亡原因。使用卡方检验、Cox 比例风险法和 Kaplan-Meier 分析进行统计分析。

结果

在规定期间,共有14686名男性接受了前列腺癌根治术,中位随访时间为58个月。其中,332名是75岁以上的男性。所有参数均为75岁以上患者与75岁以下男性之间的比较。75岁以上男性 Gleason 分级≥8级疾病的比例更高(16.6% 对 11.4%,P < 0.001),但疾病分期相似。75岁以上男性的5年和10年总生存率较低(分别为67.3% 对 96.3% 和27.7% 对 89.1%),5年和10年前列腺癌特异性生存率也较低(分别为96.2% 对 99.3% 和94.3% 对 97.4%)。多因素分析时,校正分期和分级后,年龄是前列腺癌特异性死亡和总死亡的独立危险因素(风险比1.49,95% 置信区间1.32 - 1.68;P < 0.001和风险比4.26,95% 置信区间2.15 - 8.42;P < 0.001)。

结论

在维多利亚州接受前列腺癌根治术的老年男性疾病分级较高,但分期相似。年龄是前列腺癌特异性生存率和总生存率较差的独立危险因素。

相似文献

1
Survival outcomes in elderly men undergoing radical prostatectomy in Australia.澳大利亚老年男性接受根治性前列腺切除术后的生存结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Mar;88(3):E189-E193. doi: 10.1111/ans.14166. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.新的前列腺癌分级系统可预测 Gleason 评分 8-10 级前列腺癌手术后的长期生存情况。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):907-912. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
3
Predictors of prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy: 10 year oncologic outcomes from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Registry.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌特异性死亡率的预测因素:来自维多利亚州根治性前列腺切除术登记处的10年肿瘤学结果。
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116 Suppl 3:66-72. doi: 10.1111/bju.13112.
4
Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.在接受根治性前列腺切除术的 Gleason 7 前列腺癌患者中,阳性切缘的主要 Gleason 分级 4 与转移和死亡相关。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
5
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
6
Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术 10 年后的肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1168-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.025. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
7
Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.前列腺特异性抗原水平、分期或 Gleason 评分:哪一项最适合预测根治性前列腺切除术后的结果,并且它是否因所测量的结果而异?来自共享平等访问区域癌症医院数据库的结果。
Int J Urol. 2015 Apr;22(4):362-6. doi: 10.1111/iju.12704. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
8
Aetiology and management of earlier vs later biochemical recurrence after retropubic radical prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后早期与晚期生化复发的病因及处理
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):505-510. doi: 10.1111/bju.13816. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
Rural residency and prostate cancer specific mortality: results from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Register.农村地区居住情况与前列腺癌特异性死亡率:来自维多利亚州根治性前列腺切除术登记处的结果
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Oct;38(5):449-54. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12210. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
10
Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.根治性前列腺切除术改善了 PSA 时代淋巴结阳性前列腺癌男性的无进展生存期和癌症特异性生存期:一项确认性研究。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09730.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.