Oregon State University, Integrative Biology Department, 3029 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Oregon State University, Integrative Biology Department, 3029 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov;32(11):825-834. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
Transformative research (TR) statements in scientific grant proposals have become mainstream. However, TR is defined as radically changing our understanding of a concept, causing a paradigm shift, or opening new frontiers. We argue that it is rarely possible to predict the transformative nature of research. Interviews and surveys of 78 transformative ecologists suggest that most TR began with incremental goals, while transformative potential was recognized later. Most respondents thought TR is unpredictable and should not be prioritized over 'incremental' research that typically leads to breakthroughs. Importantly, TR directives might encourage scientists to overstate the importance of their research. We recommend that granting agencies (i) allocate only a subset of funds to TR and (ii) solicit more realistic proposal statements.
变革性研究(TR)在科学资助提案中已经变得很普遍。然而,TR 的定义是从根本上改变我们对一个概念的理解,引发范式转变,或开拓新的前沿。我们认为,预测研究的变革性质是很少有可能的。对 78 位变革性生态学家的访谈和调查表明,大多数 TR 开始时都有渐进的目标,而后来才认识到变革的潜力。大多数受访者认为 TR 是不可预测的,不应该优先于通常会导致突破的“渐进式”研究。重要的是,TR 指令可能会鼓励科学家夸大其研究的重要性。我们建议资助机构(i)只将一部分资金分配给 TR,(ii)征求更现实的提案陈述。