Suppr超能文献

脆性 X 综合征患儿神经表型的纵向鉴定。

Longitudinal identification of clinically distinct neurophenotypes in young children with fragile X syndrome.

机构信息

Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5795;

Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5795.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 3;114(40):10767-10772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620994114. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS), due to mutations of the gene, is the most common known inherited cause of developmental disability. The cognitive, behavioral, and neurological phenotypes observed in affected individuals can vary considerably, making it difficult to predict outcomes and determine the need for interventions. We sought to examine early structural brain growth as a potential marker for identification of clinically meaningful subgroups. Participants included 42 very young boys with FXS who completed a T1-weighted anatomical MRI and cognitive/behavioral assessment at two longitudinal time points, with mean ages of 2.89 y and 4.91 y. Topological data analysis (TDA), an unsupervised approach to multivariate pattern analysis, was applied to the longitudinal anatomical data to identify coherent but heretofore unknown subgroups. TDA revealed two large subgroups within the study population based solely on longitudinal MRI data. Post hoc comparisons of cognition, adaptive functioning, and autism severity scores between these groups demonstrated that one group was consistently higher functioning on all measures at both time points, with pronounced and significant unidirectional differences ( < 0.05 for time point 1 and/or time point 2 for each measure). These results support the existence of two longitudinally defined, neuroanatomically distinct, and clinically relevant phenotypes among boys with FXS. If confirmed by additional analyses, such information may be used to predict outcomes and guide design of targeted therapies. Furthermore, TDA of longitudinal anatomical MRI data may represent a useful method for reliably and objectively defining subtypes within other neuropsychiatric disorders.

摘要

脆性 X 综合征(FXS)是由于基因发生突变引起的,是最常见的已知遗传性发育障碍病因。在受影响的个体中观察到的认知、行为和神经表型差异可能相当大,这使得预测结果和确定干预需求变得困难。我们试图研究早期结构性大脑生长作为识别具有临床意义的亚组的潜在标志物。参与者包括 42 名患有 FXS 的非常年幼的男孩,他们在两个纵向时间点完成了 T1 加权解剖 MRI 和认知/行为评估,平均年龄分别为 2.89 岁和 4.91 岁。拓扑数据分析(TDA)是一种用于多变量模式分析的无监督方法,应用于纵向解剖数据以识别连贯但迄今未知的亚组。TDA 仅根据纵向 MRI 数据,在研究人群中发现了两个大的亚组。对这些组之间的认知、适应功能和自闭症严重程度评分进行的事后比较表明,一组在两个时间点的所有测量值上始终具有更高的功能,表现出明显且显著的单向差异(每个测量值在时间点 1 和/或时间点 2 时 < 0.05)。这些结果支持 FXS 男孩存在两种纵向定义的、神经解剖学不同的和具有临床意义的表型。如果通过其他分析得到证实,这种信息可能用于预测结果并指导靶向治疗的设计。此外,纵向解剖 MRI 数据的 TDA 可能代表一种可靠且客观地定义其他神经精神障碍亚组的有用方法。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal identification of clinically distinct neurophenotypes in young children with fragile X syndrome.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 3;114(40):10767-10772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620994114. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
Topological methods reveal high and low functioning neuro-phenotypes within fragile X syndrome.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Sep;35(9):4904-15. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22521. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
3
Trajectories of early brain volume development in fragile X syndrome and autism.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;51(9):921-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
4
Cognition and lobar morphology in full mutation boys with fragile X syndrome.
Brain Cogn. 2012 Feb;78(1):74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
5
Neuroanatomical differences in toddler boys with fragile x syndrome and idiopathic autism.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;68(3):295-305. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.153. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
7
Aberrant frontal lobe maturation in adolescents with fragile X syndrome is related to delayed cognitive maturation.
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 1;70(9):852-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
10
Cognitive and behavioral correlates of caudate subregion shape variation in fragile X syndrome.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jun;35(6):2861-8. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22376. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain volumes in genetic syndromes associated with mTOR dysregulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(4):1676-1688. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02863-4. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Topological Structures in the Space of Treatment-Naïve Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;16(15):2662. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152662.
3
Latent Class Analysis Identifies Distinctive Behavioral Subtypes in Children with Fragile X Syndrome.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Feb;54(2):725-737. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05821-7. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
NeuMapper: A scalable computational framework for multiscale exploration of the brain's dynamical organization.
Netw Neurosci. 2022 Jun 1;6(2):467-498. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00229. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Heterogeneity in Fragile X Syndrome Highlights the Need for Precision Medicine-Based Treatments.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 30;12:722378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.722378. eCollection 2021.
6
Emergence and rate of autism in fragile X syndrome across the first years of life.
Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Oct;32(4):1335-1352. doi: 10.1017/S0954579420000942.
7
Topology predicts long-term functional outcome in early psychosis.
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;26(9):5335-5346. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0826-1. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
Developmental studies in fragile X syndrome.
J Neurodev Disord. 2020 May 2;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s11689-020-09310-9.
9
A framework for the investigation of rare genetic disorders in neuropsychiatry.
Nat Med. 2019 Oct;25(10):1477-1487. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0581-5. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
10
Generating dynamical neuroimaging spatiotemporal representations (DyNeuSR) using topological data analysis.
Netw Neurosci. 2019 Jul 1;3(3):763-778. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00093. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensory processing in autism spectrum disorders and Fragile X syndrome-From the clinic to animal models.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 May;76(Pt B):235-253. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 May 24.
2
Mavoglurant in fragile X syndrome: Results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jan 13;8(321):321ra5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab4109.
4
Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) interacting proteins exhibit different expression patterns during development.
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2015 May;42:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
5
6
Longitudinal profiles of adaptive behavior in fragile X syndrome.
Pediatrics. 2014 Aug;134(2):315-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3990.
7
Aberrant face and gaze habituation in fragile x syndrome.
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;171(10):1099-106. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13111464.
8
Topological methods reveal high and low functioning neuro-phenotypes within fragile X syndrome.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Sep;35(9):4904-15. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22521. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
9
The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: precision medicine for psychiatry.
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;171(4):395-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14020138.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验