Medical Electronics and Signal Processing Research Unit, University of South Wales, Treforest, CF37 1DL, United Kingdom.
J Neural Eng. 2018 Feb;15(1):016019. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8d8a.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique that delivers a low-intensity, direct current to cortical areas with the purpose of modulating underlying brain activity. Recent studies have reported inconsistencies in tDCS outcomes. The underlying assumption of many tDCS studies has been that replication of electrode montage equates to replicating stimulation conditions. It is possible however that anatomical difference between subjects, as well as inherent inaccuracies in montage placement, could affect current flow to targeted areas. The hypothesis that stimulation of a defined brain region will be stable under small displacements was tested.
Initially, we compared the total simulated current flowing through ten specific brain areas for four commonly used tDCS montages: F3-Fp2, C3-Fp2, Fp1-F4, and P3-P4 using the software tool COMETS. The effect of a slight (~1 cm in each of four directions) anode displacement on the simulated regional current density for each of the four tDCS montages was then determined. Current flow was calculated and compared through ten segmented brain areas to determine the effect of montage type and displacement. The regional currents, as well as the localised current densities, were compared with the original electrode location, for each of these new positions.
Recommendations for montages that maximise stimulation current for the ten brain regions are considered. We noted that the extent to which stimulation is affected by electrode displacement varies depending on both area and montage type. The F3-Fp2 montage was found to be the least stable with up to 38% change in average current density in the left frontal lobe while the Fp1-F4 montage was found to the most stable exhibiting only 1% change when electrodes were displaced.
These results indicate that even relatively small changes in stimulation electrode placement appear to result in surprisingly large changes in current densities and distribution.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种神经调节技术,通过向皮质区域施加低强度直流电来调节大脑的基础活动。最近的研究报告表明 tDCS 的结果存在不一致性。许多 tDCS 研究的基本假设是,电极排列的复制等同于复制刺激条件。然而,研究对象之间的解剖差异,以及排列位置的固有不准确性,都可能会影响到目标区域的电流流动。本文假设,在小位移下,对特定脑区的刺激将是稳定的。
首先,我们使用 COMETS 软件工具比较了四种常用 tDCS 排列方式(F3-Fp2、C3-Fp2、Fp1-F4 和 P3-P4)下,十个特定脑区的总模拟电流。然后,确定了阳极在四个方向上轻微(每个方向约 1 厘米)位移对四种 tDCS 排列方式的模拟区域电流密度的影响。通过十个分段脑区计算和比较电流,以确定排列方式和位移的影响。针对这些新位置,我们比较了区域电流以及局部电流密度与原始电极位置的差异。
我们考虑了推荐的能够最大化十个脑区刺激电流的排列方式。我们注意到,刺激受电极位移影响的程度取决于脑区和排列方式。F3-Fp2 排列的稳定性最低,左额叶的平均电流密度变化高达 38%,而 Fp1-F4 排列的稳定性最高,电极位移时仅变化 1%。
这些结果表明,即使是刺激电极位置的相对较小变化,似乎也会导致电流密度和分布的惊人变化。