Winter Alfred, Takabayashi Katsuhiko, Jahn Franziska, Kimura Eizen, Engelbrecht Rolf, Haux Reinhold, Honda Masayuki, Hübner Ursula H, Inoue Sozo, Kohl Christian D, Matsumoto Takehiro, Matsumura Yasushi, Miyo Kengo, Nakashima Naoki, Prokosch Hans-Ulrich, Staemmler Martin
Prof. Alfred Winter, University of Leipzig, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Haertelstr. 16 -18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany, E-mail:
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Aug 7;56(7):e92-e104. doi: 10.3414/ME17-05-0002.
For more than 30 years, there has been close cooperation between Japanese and German scientists with regard to information systems in health care. Collaboration has been formalized by an agreement between the respective scientific associations. Following this agreement, two joint workshops took place to explore the similarities and differences of electronic health record systems (EHRS) against the background of the two national healthcare systems that share many commonalities.
To establish a framework and requirements for the quality of EHRS that may also serve as a basis for comparing different EHRS.
Donabedian's three dimensions of quality of medical care were adapted to the outcome, process, and structural quality of EHRS and their management. These quality dimensions were proposed before the first workshop of EHRS experts and enriched during the discussions.
The Quality Requirements Framework of EHRS (QRF-EHRS) was defined and complemented by requirements for high quality EHRS. The framework integrates three quality dimensions (outcome, process, and structural quality), three layers of information systems (processes and data, applications, and physical tools) and three dimensions of information management (strategic, tactical, and operational information management).
Describing and comparing the quality of EHRS is in fact a multidimensional problem as given by the QRF-EHRS framework. This framework will be utilized to compare Japanese and German EHRS, notably those that were presented at the second workshop.
30多年来,日本和德国科学家在医疗保健信息系统方面开展了密切合作。双方科学协会之间的一项协议使合作正式化。根据该协议,举办了两次联合研讨会,以探讨在具有许多共同特点的两国医疗体系背景下电子健康记录系统(EHRS)的异同。
建立EHRS质量的框架和要求,也可作为比较不同EHRS的基础。
将多纳贝迪安医疗保健质量的三个维度应用于EHRS的结果、过程和结构质量及其管理。这些质量维度在EHRS专家第一次研讨会之前提出,并在讨论过程中得到充实。
定义了EHRS质量要求框架(QRF-EHRS),并辅以高质量EHRS的要求。该框架整合了三个质量维度(结果、过程和结构质量)、三层信息系统(过程和数据、应用程序和物理工具)以及信息管理的三个维度(战略、战术和运营信息管理)。
描述和比较EHRS的质量实际上是一个由QRF-EHRS框架给出的多维问题。该框架将用于比较日本和德国的EHRS,特别是在第二次研讨会上展示的那些。