Loewen Kassandra, Bocking Natalie, Matsumoto Cai-Lei, Kirlew Mike, Kelly Len
Anishnaabe Bimaadiziwin Research Program and Sioux Lookout Local Education Group, Sioux Lookout, Ont.
Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority, Sioux Lookout, Ont.
Can J Rural Med. 2017 Fall;22(4):131-138.
High rates of invasive group A disease were suspected by clinicians in northwestern Ontario. Patients with sepsis were being encountered with bacteremia positive for group A . This study was designed to assess the incidence of invasive group A Streptococcus infection in the region and provide best-practice treatment information.
We performed a retrospective chart review at the Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre (SLMHC) from 2009 to 2014 to examine rates of infection due to invasive group A and outcomes. All blood cultures from 2015 were also examined to calculate the relative rates of distinct pathogens responsible for cases of bacteremia. A literature review on this topic was performed, with attention to rural incidence where available and clinical practice guidelines.
Invasive group A disease was diagnosed in 65 patients during the study period. Most (37 [57%]) had bacteremia without a clinical focus. Type 2 diabetes mellitus was a comorbid condition in 27 (42%) and skin conditions in 30 (46%). The case fatality rate was 4.6%. In 2015, group A accounted for 8% of all positive blood cultures from in- and outpatients in the catchment area. The calculated annual incidence rate of invasive group A infection was 37.2 cases per 100 000 population.
Rural physicians may encounter group A bacteremia in their practice. The death rate associated with these infections can be as high as 20%, and patients require urgent treatment, typically with intravenous penicillin and clindamycin therapy. The rate of invasive group A infection in the predominantly First Nations population served by the SLMHC exceeded the Canadian rate eightfold and is comparable to rates observed in low-income countries and among Indigenous populations in Australia. This disparity may result from inadequate housing, overcrowding or limited access to clean water.
安大略省西北部的临床医生怀疑侵袭性A组疾病发病率很高。脓毒症患者出现了A组菌血症阳性情况。本研究旨在评估该地区侵袭性A组链球菌感染的发病率,并提供最佳治疗信息。
我们对2009年至2014年在苏圣玛丽梅诺亚温健康中心(SLMHC)进行了回顾性病历审查,以检查侵袭性A组感染率及转归情况。还检查了2015年所有血培养结果,以计算导致菌血症病例的不同病原体的相对比率。对该主题进行了文献综述,关注可得的农村发病率及临床实践指南。
在研究期间,65例患者被诊断为侵袭性A组疾病。大多数(37例[57%])有菌血症但无临床病灶。2型糖尿病是27例(42%)的合并症,皮肤病是30例(46%)的合并症。病死率为4.6%。2015年,A组占集水区内、外门诊患者所有阳性血培养结果的8%。计算得出侵袭性A组感染的年发病率为每10万人口37.2例。
农村医生在临床工作中可能会遇到A组菌血症。这些感染相关的死亡率可能高达20%,患者需要紧急治疗,通常采用静脉注射青霉素和克林霉素治疗。SLMHC服务的以原住民为主的人群中侵袭性A组感染率超过加拿大平均水平八倍,与低收入国家以及澳大利亚原住民人群中的发病率相当。这种差异可能是由于住房条件差、过度拥挤或获得清洁水的机会有限所致。