• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犬心外膜电导和远端阻力冠状动脉血管中H1和H2受体介导的组胺反应差异

Differential H1- and H2-receptor-mediated histamine responses of canine epicardial conductance and distal resistance coronary vessels.

作者信息

Miller W L, Bove A A

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

出版信息

Circ Res. 1988 Feb;62(2):226-32. doi: 10.1161/01.res.62.2.226.

DOI:10.1161/01.res.62.2.226
PMID:2892593
Abstract

The contributions of histamine (H1 or H2) receptor-mediated responses and, therefore, the effects of histamine blocking agents are unclear with regard to regulation of proximal epicardial and distal resistance coronary arteries. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of selective H1- and H2-receptor antagonists on epicardial and resistance vessels in the closed chest dog model. Histamine, diphenhydramine (H1 blocker), and cimetidine (H2 blocker) were infused into the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and responses were studied by quantitative coronary angiography and flow measurements (133Xe washout). Histamine infusion alone produced a significant dilation of the proximal LAD (13% above control) only at the highest dose (45 micrograms/min), while LAD flow was increased by 128%. In the presence of H1 blocker, histamine produced significantly greater epicardial dilation (55% above control). The flow response curve was shifted to the right in the presence of H1 blocker, but the flow attenuation was overcome by the highest histamine dose. In contrast, the H2 blocker attenuated both epicardial dilation (6% below control) and flow response (31% above control) to the highest histamine dose. Results support a differential regulation of proximal epicardial and distal resistance vessels to histamine with epicardial arteries demonstrating H1-mediated vasoconstriction and H2-mediated vasodilation and distal resistance vessels showing H1- and H2-mediated vasodilation. In addition, these findings suggest that H1 blockade may antagonize histamine-related vasoconstriction and vasospasm, while H2 blockers may permit unopposed H1-mediated vasoconstriction of epicardial arteries and also limit resistance vessel vasodilatory responsiveness in the presence of elevated tissue histamine, as may occur in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.

摘要

关于组胺(H1或H2)受体介导的反应以及组胺阻断剂的作用,在近端心外膜和远端阻力冠状动脉的调节方面尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估选择性H1和H2受体拮抗剂对闭胸犬模型中心外膜血管和阻力血管的影响。将组胺、苯海拉明(H1阻断剂)和西咪替丁(H2阻断剂)注入左冠状动脉前降支(LAD),并通过定量冠状动脉造影和血流测量(133Xe洗脱)研究其反应。单独输注组胺仅在最高剂量(45微克/分钟)时使近端LAD显著扩张(比对照高13%),而LAD血流量增加了128%。在存在H1阻断剂的情况下,组胺产生了显著更大的心外膜扩张(比对照高55%)。在存在H1阻断剂的情况下,血流反应曲线向右移动,但最高剂量的组胺克服了血流衰减。相比之下,H2阻断剂减弱了对最高组胺剂量的心外膜扩张(比对照低6%)和血流反应(比对照高31%)。结果支持近端心外膜血管和远端阻力血管对组胺的调节存在差异,心外膜动脉表现为H1介导的血管收缩和H2介导的血管舒张,而远端阻力血管表现为H1和H2介导的血管舒张。此外,这些发现表明,H1阻断可能拮抗组胺相关的血管收缩和血管痉挛,而H2阻断剂可能允许心外膜动脉不受抑制的H1介导的血管收缩,并且在组织组胺升高的情况下(如在动脉粥样硬化性冠状动脉疾病中可能发生的情况)也限制阻力血管的血管舒张反应性。

相似文献

1
Differential H1- and H2-receptor-mediated histamine responses of canine epicardial conductance and distal resistance coronary vessels.犬心外膜电导和远端阻力冠状动脉血管中H1和H2受体介导的组胺反应差异
Circ Res. 1988 Feb;62(2):226-32. doi: 10.1161/01.res.62.2.226.
2
Effects of histamine receptor stimulation on regional myocardial blood flow.组胺受体刺激对局部心肌血流的影响。
Am J Physiol. 1983 Sep;245(3):H461-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1983.245.3.H461.
3
Effects of histamine on coronary hemodynamics in humans: role of H1 and H2 receptors.组胺对人体冠状动脉血流动力学的影响:H1和H2受体的作用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Dec;10(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80120-1.
4
Differentiation of the roles of histamine H1- and H2-receptors in the mediation of the effects of histamine in the isolated working heart of the guinea-pig.组胺H1和H2受体在豚鼠离体工作心脏中介导组胺作用的角色分化
Br J Pharmacol. 1979 Jan;65(1):127-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1979.tb17341.x.
5
Regional vascular resistance and heart rate responses mediated through H1- and H2-histamine receptors in the unanaesthetised rabbit.未麻醉兔中通过H1和H2组胺受体介导的局部血管阻力和心率反应
Eur J Pharmacol. 1977 Sep 1;45(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(77)90056-5.
6
Evaluation of the role of Histamine H1- and H2-receptors in cutaneous inflammation in the guinea-pig produced by histamine and mast cell degranulation.组胺H1和H2受体在组胺和肥大细胞脱颗粒引起的豚鼠皮肤炎症中的作用评估。
Br J Pharmacol. 1980 Aug;69(4):615-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb07912.x.
7
Histamine H1- and H2-receptor vasodilation of canine intestinal circulation.组胺H1和H2受体对犬肠道循环的血管舒张作用。
Am J Physiol. 1977 Sep;233(3):E219-24. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1977.233.3.E219.
8
[Effect of histamine on intracortical blood vessels of rats].[组胺对大鼠大脑皮质内血管的作用]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2006 Sep;26(9):1284-7.
9
Prostaglandin E1 and nitroglycerin effects on canine epicardial conductance and distal coronary resistance vessels.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989 Aug;14(2):260-7. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198908000-00012.
10
Effects of histamine H1-receptor stimulation on coronary hemodynamics in man.组胺H1受体刺激对人体冠状动脉血流动力学的影响。
Agents Actions. 1985 Oct;17(1):38-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01966678.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological investigations on mast cell stabilizer and histamine receptor antagonists in vincristine-induced neuropathic pain.长春新碱诱导神经病理性疼痛中肥大细胞稳定剂和组胺受体拮抗剂的药理学研究。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;390(11):1087-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00210-017-1426-8. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow.冠状动脉血流的调节
Compr Physiol. 2017 Mar 16;7(2):321-382. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c160016.
3
Histamine-induced vasodilatation in the human forearm vasculature.组胺诱导的人体前臂血管系统血管舒张。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Nov;76(5):699-707. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12110.
4
Stress-induced cardiomyopathy associated with a transfusion reaction: A case of potential crosstalk between the histaminic and adrenergic systems.与输血反应相关的应激性心肌病:组胺能系统与肾上腺素能系统潜在相互作用的一例报告
Exp Clin Cardiol. 2011 Spring;16(1):30-2.