Verkhivker G M
Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Department of Computational Biosciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Mol Biosyst. 2017 Oct 24;13(11):2235-2253. doi: 10.1039/c7mb00355b.
The overarching goal of delineating molecular principles underlying differentiation of the activation mechanisms in cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) is important for understanding regulatory divergences among closely related kinases which can be exploited in drug discovery of targeted and allosteric inhibitors. To systematically characterize dynamic, energetic and network signatures of the activation mechanisms, we combined atomistic simulations and elastic network modeling with the analysis of the residue interaction networks and rigidity decomposition of the CDK2-cyclin A and CDK4-cyclin D1/D3 complexes. The results of this study show that divergences in the activation mechanisms of CDK2 and CDK4 may be determined by differences in stabilization and allosteric cooperativity of the regulatory regions. We show that differential stabilization of the kinase lobes in the CDK4-cyclin D complexes caused by the elevated mobility of the N-lobe residues can weaken allosteric interactions between regulatory regions and compromise cooperativity of the inter-lobe motions that is required to trigger activating transitions. Network modelling and percolation analysis were used to emulate thermal unfolding and perform decomposition of rigid and flexible regions in the CDK2 and CDK4 complexes. These simulations showed that the percolation phase transition in the CDK2-cyclin A complexes is highly cooperative and driven by allosteric coupling between functional regions from both kinase lobes. In contrast, the imbalances in the distribution of rigid and flexible regions for the CDK4-cyclin D complexes, which are manifested by the intrinsic instability of the N-lobe, may weaken allosteric interactions and preclude productive activation. The results of this integrative computational study offer a simple and robust network-based model that explains regulatory divergences between CDK2 and CDK4 kinases.
阐明细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)激活机制分化背后的分子原理这一总体目标,对于理解密切相关激酶之间的调控差异非常重要,而这些差异可用于靶向和变构抑制剂的药物发现。为了系统地表征激活机制的动态、能量和网络特征,我们将原子模拟和弹性网络建模与CDK2-细胞周期蛋白A和CDK4-细胞周期蛋白D1/D3复合物的残基相互作用网络分析及刚性分解相结合。这项研究的结果表明,CDK2和CDK4激活机制的差异可能由调控区域的稳定性和变构协同作用的差异决定。我们表明,N叶残基流动性升高导致CDK4-细胞周期蛋白D复合物中激酶叶的差异稳定性,会削弱调控区域之间的变构相互作用,并损害触发激活转变所需的叶间运动协同性。网络建模和渗流分析用于模拟热展开并对CDK2和CDK4复合物中的刚性和柔性区域进行分解。这些模拟表明,CDK2-细胞周期蛋白A复合物中的渗流相变具有高度协同性,并由来自两个激酶叶的功能区域之间的变构耦合驱动。相比之下,CDK4-细胞周期蛋白D复合物中刚性和柔性区域分布的不平衡,表现为N叶的固有不稳定性,可能会削弱变构相互作用并阻止有效激活。这项综合计算研究的结果提供了一个简单而强大的基于网络的模型,解释了CDK2和CDK4激酶之间的调控差异。