在一个33岁及以下女性此前已接种HPV疫苗的女性群体中,采用原发性HPV检测或细胞学进行宫颈癌筛查:指南针试点随机试验的结果。
Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
作者信息
Canfell Karen, Caruana Michael, Gebski Val, Darlington-Brown Jessica, Heley Stella, Brotherton Julia, Gertig Dorota, Jennett Chloe J, Farnsworth Annabelle, Tan Jeffrey, Wrede C David, Castle Philip E, Saville Marion
机构信息
Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 19;14(9):e1002388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002388. eCollection 2017 Sep.
BACKGROUND
Using primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical screening increases detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplastic lesions and invasive cancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ [CIN2+]) compared to cytology, but no evaluation has been conducted in a population previously offered HPV vaccination. We aimed to assess colposcopy referral and CIN2+ detection rates for HPV-screened versus cytology-screened women in Australia's HPV-vaccinated population (by 2014, resident women ≤33 years had been age-eligible for HPV vaccination, with 3-dose uptake across age cohorts being about 50%-77%).
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Compass is an open-label randomised trial of 5-yearly HPV screening versus 2.5-yearly liquid-based cytology (LBC) screening. In the first phase, consenting women aged 25-64 years presenting for routine screening at 47 primary practices in Victoria, Australia, provided a cervical sample and were randomised at a central laboratory at a 1:2:2 allocation to (i) image-read LBC screening with HPV triage of low-grade cytology ('LBC screening'), (ii) HPV screening with those HPV16/18 positive referred to colposcopy and with LBC triage for other oncogenic (OHR) types ('HPV+LBC triage'), or (iii) HPV screening with those HPV16/18 positive referred to colposcopy and with dual-stained cytology triage for OHR types ('HPV+DS triage'). A total of 5,006 eligible women were recruited from 29 October 2013 to 7 November 2014 (recruitment rate 58%); of these, 22% were in the group age-eligible for vaccination. Data on 4,995 participants were analysed after 11 withdrawals; 998 were assigned to, and 995 analysed (99.7%) in, the LBC-screened group; 1,996 assigned to and 1,992 analysed (99.8%) in the HPV+LBC triage group; and 2,012 assigned to and 2,008 analysed (99.8%) in the HPV+DS triage group. No serious trial-related adverse events were reported. The main outcomes were colposcopy referral and detected CIN2+ rates at baseline screening, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis after follow-up of the subgroup of triage-negative women in each arm referred to 12 months of surveillance, and after a further 6 months of follow-up for histological outcomes (dataset closed 31 August 2016). Analysis was adjusted for whether women had been age-eligible for HPV vaccination or not. For the LBC-screened group, the overall referral and detected CIN2+ rates were 27/995 (2.7% [95% CI 1.8%-3.9%]) and 1/995 (0.1% [95% CI 0.0%-0.6%]), respectively; for HPV+LBC triage, these were 75/1,992 (3.8% [95% CI 3.0%-4.7%]) and 20/1,992 (1.0% [95% CI 0.6%-1.5%]); and for HPV+DS triage, these were 79/2,008 (3.9% [95% CI 3.1%-4.9%]) and 24/2,008 (1.2% [95% CI 0.8%-1.6%]) (p = 0.09 for difference in referral rate in LBC versus all HPV-screened women; p = 0.003 for difference in CIN2+ detection rate in LBC versus all HPV-screened women, with p = 0.62 between HPV screening groups). Limitations include that the study population involved a relatively low risk group in a previously well-screened and treated population, that individual women's vaccination status was unknown, and that long-term follow-up data on disease detection in screen-negative women are not yet available.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, primary HPV screening was associated with significantly increased detection of high-grade precancerous cervical lesions compared to cytology, in a population where high vaccine uptake was reported in women aged 33 years or younger who were offered vaccination. It had been predicted that increased disease detection might be associated with a transient increase in colposcopy referral rates in the first round of HPV screening, possibly dampened by HPV vaccine effect; in this study, although the point estimates for referral rates in women in each HPV-screened group were 41%-44% higher than in cytology-screened women, the difference in referral rate between cytology- and HPV-screened women was not significant. These findings provide initial support for the implementation of primary HPV screening in vaccinated populations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001207707.
背景
与细胞学检查相比,采用原发性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测进行宫颈癌筛查可提高高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变和浸润癌(宫颈上皮内瘤变2级及以上[CIN2+])的检出率,但尚未在先前接种过HPV疫苗的人群中进行评估。我们旨在评估在澳大利亚已接种HPV疫苗的人群中(截至2014年,33岁及以下常住女性符合HPV疫苗接种年龄,各年龄组3剂疫苗接种率约为50%-77%),接受HPV筛查与细胞学筛查的女性的阴道镜检查转诊率和CIN2+检出率。
方法与结果
Compass是一项开放标签随机试验,比较每5年进行一次HPV筛查与每2.5年进行一次液基细胞学(LBC)筛查。在第一阶段,25至64岁、在澳大利亚维多利亚州47家基层医疗机构进行常规筛查的同意参与试验的女性提供宫颈样本,并在中央实验室按1:2:2分配随机分组,分别接受:(i)图像读取LBC筛查,对低级别细胞学结果进行HPV分流(“LBC筛查”);(ii)HPV筛查,HPV16/18阳性者转诊至阴道镜检查,其他致癌(OHR)型别进行LBC分流(“HPV+LBC分流”);或(iii)HPV筛查,HPV16/18阳性者转诊至阴道镜检查,OHR型别进行双重染色细胞学分流(“HPV+DS分流”)。2013年10月29日至2014年11月7日共招募了5006名符合条件的女性(招募率58%);其中22%属于符合疫苗接种年龄的组。11名退出者后对4995名参与者的数据进行了分析;LBC筛查组998名被分配并995名进行了分析(99.7%);HPV+LBC分流组1996名被分配并1992名进行了分析(99.8%);HPV+DS分流组2012名被分配并2008名进行了分析(99.8%)。未报告与试验相关的严重不良事件。主要结局是基线筛查时的阴道镜检查转诊率和CIN2+检出率,在对各臂中接受12个月监测的分流阴性女性亚组进行随访后,基于意向性分析进行评估,并在进一步随访6个月以获取组织学结果后(数据集于2016年8月31日关闭)。分析对女性是否符合HPV疫苗接种年龄进行了校正。LBC筛查组的总体转诊率和CIN2+检出率分别为27/995(2.7%[95%CI 1.8%-3.9%])和1/995(0.1%[95%CI 0.0%-0.6%]);HPV+LBC分流组分别为75/1992(3.8%[95%CI 3.0%-4.7%])和20/1992(1.0%[95%CI 0.6%-1.5%]);HPV+DS分流组分别为79/2008(3.9%[95%CI 3.1%-4.9%])和
相似文献
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018-10-23
引用本文的文献
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2022-3-1
本文引用的文献
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016-4-26
Med J Aust. 2016-3-21
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014-7-18