Suppr超能文献

运用对话分析鉴别精神性非癫痫性发作与癫痫发作。

Differentiating PNES from epileptic seizures using conversational analysis.

作者信息

Papagno Costanza, Montali Lorenzo, Turner Katherine, Frigerio Alessandra, Sirtori Martina, Zambrelli Elena, Chiesa Valentina, Canevini Maria Paola

机构信息

CIMeC and CeRiN, University of Trento, via Matteo Del Ben 5/b, 38068 Rovereto, Italy; Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Edificio U6, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Edificio U6, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Nov;76:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.034. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

Abstract

We applied conversation analysis in an unselected continuous series of 70 patients to discriminate patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) from patients with epilepsy. Two psychologists examined the patients' recorded reports. Patients were also submitted to an extensive neuropsychological battery in order to verify whether specific cognitive deficits or mental health problems are typical of patients with PNES and whether some cognitive deficits could prevent the correct diagnosis. The results showed a good percentage of correct diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 0.795 and a specificity of 0.83, while no difference in the cognitive profile was found between patients with PNES and patients with epilepsy. The results also suggest that psychologists can apply the conversation analysis as well as linguists, which is an important finding since psychologists are employed in specialized centers, while linguists in general are not part of the team.

摘要

我们对70例未经挑选的连续病例应用对话分析,以区分精神性非癫痫性发作(PNES)患者和癫痫患者。两名心理学家检查了患者的记录报告。患者还接受了全面的神经心理测试,以验证特定的认知缺陷或心理健康问题是否是PNES患者的典型特征,以及某些认知缺陷是否会妨碍正确诊断。结果显示正确诊断的比例较高,敏感性为0.795,特异性为0.83,而PNES患者和癫痫患者在认知特征上未发现差异。结果还表明,心理学家和语言学家一样可以应用对话分析,这是一项重要发现,因为心理学家受雇于专业中心,而语言学家一般不属于团队成员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验