Siddhartha B S Vijay, Sharma N G Anish, Kamble Shashank, Shankaranarayana P
Department of Anaesthesiology, KVG Medical College, Sullia, Karnataka, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):550-553. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_41_17.
Insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) in an anesthetized, comatose intubated patient is not always as easy as in a conscious, cooperative patient. Various techniques have been tried with varying success. The aim of this randomized study was to compare and evaluate the two techniques of NGT insertion with the conventional technique of insertion with respect to success rate, time taken for insertion and adverse effects.
Patients admitted for laparoscopic hysterectomy were chosen and then were divided into three equal groups of forty each, by randomized technique. Group C included patients in whom conventional method was used to insert NGT. Group R where reverse Sellick's technique was used. Group F where neck flexion with lateral pressure was used.
Both the techniques were better than the conventional method. Among both the techniques, reverse Sellick's technique was the best method but not without adverse effects. The required insertion time was very less and success in the first attempt was more in the group where reverse Sellick's was used.
Modified techniques of NGT insertion were better than the conventional method. Further studies after eliminating major limitations are required to really find a superior technique.
在麻醉、昏迷且已插管的患者中插入鼻胃管(NGT)并不总是像在意识清醒、配合的患者中那样容易。人们尝试了各种技术,效果各不相同。这项随机研究的目的是比较和评估两种NGT插入技术与传统插入技术在成功率、插入时间和不良反应方面的差异。
选择因腹腔镜子宫切除术入院的患者,然后通过随机技术将其平均分为三组,每组40人。C组包括采用传统方法插入NGT的患者。R组采用反向塞利克技术。F组采用颈部屈曲加侧压技术。
两种技术均优于传统方法。在这两种技术中,反向塞利克技术是最佳方法,但并非没有不良反应。使用反向塞利克技术的组所需插入时间非常短,首次尝试的成功率更高。
改良的NGT插入技术优于传统方法。需要在消除主要局限性后进行进一步研究,以真正找到一种更优的技术。