Suppr超能文献

稳健实用的局部动脉波速和平均血流速度波形的无创估计。

Robust and practical non-invasive estimation of local arterial wave speed and mean blood velocity waveforms.

机构信息

Heart Research, Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Department of Cardiology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Physiol Meas. 2017 Nov 1;38(11):2081-2099. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa8de3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Local arterial wave speed, a surrogate of vessel stiffness, can be estimated via the pressure-velocity (PU) and diameter-velocity (ln(D)U) loop methods. These assume negligible early-systolic reflected waves (RWes) and require measurement of cross-sectionally averaged velocity (U ), which is related to volumetric blood flow. However, RWes may not always be negligible and Doppler ultrasound typically provides maximum velocity waveforms or estimates of mean velocity subject to various errors (U ). This study investigates how these issues affect wave speed estimation and explores more robust methods for obtaining local wave speed and U .

APPROACH

Using aortic phase-contrast MRI (PCMRI, n  =  34) and a simulated virtual cohort (n  =  3325), we assessed errors in calculated wave speed caused by RWes and use of U rather than true U . By combining PU and ln(D)U loop wave speed values, (i) a corrected wave speed (ln(D)P), insensitive to RWes and velocity errors, was derived; and (ii) a novel method for estimating U from U was proposed (where U can be any scaled version of U ).

MAIN RESULTS

Proof-of-principle was established via PCMRI data and in the ascending aorta, carotid, brachial and femoral arteries of the virtual cohort, with acceptably low wave speed and U errors obtained even when local pressure was estimated from diameter and mean/diastolic brachial pressures.

SIGNIFICANCE

Given a locally measured diameter waveform and brachial cuff pressures, (i) the velocity- and RWes-independent ln(D)P method can be applied non-invasively and is likely more robust than ln(D)U and PU loop methods; and (ii) U can be estimated from routinely-acquired U .

摘要

目的

局部动脉波速是血管僵硬度的替代指标,可以通过压力-速度(PU)和直径-速度(ln(D)U)环方法来估计。这些方法假设早期收缩期反射波(RWes)可以忽略不计,并且需要测量横截面上的平均速度(U),这与容积血流有关。然而,RWes 可能并不总是可以忽略不计,而多普勒超声通常提供最大速度波形或受各种误差影响的平均速度估计值(U)。本研究探讨了这些问题如何影响波速估计,并探索了获得局部波速和 U 的更稳健方法。

方法

使用主动脉相位对比磁共振成像(PCMRI,n=34)和模拟虚拟队列(n=3325),我们评估了 RWes 和使用 U 而不是真实 U 对计算波速产生的误差。通过组合 PU 和 ln(D)U 环波速值,(i)得出一种对 RWes 和速度误差不敏感的校正波速(ln(D)P);(ii)提出了一种从 U 估计 U 的新方法(其中 U 可以是 U 的任何缩放版本)。

主要结果

通过 PCMRI 数据和虚拟队列的升主动脉、颈动脉、肱动脉和股动脉证明了原理,即使从直径和肱动脉平均/舒张压力估计局部压力,也可以获得可接受的低波速和 U 误差。

意义

给定局部测量的直径波形和肱动脉袖带压力,(i)可以非侵入性地应用与速度和 RWes 无关的 ln(D)P 方法,并且比 ln(D)U 和 PU 环方法更稳健;(ii)可以从常规获得的 U 估计 U。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验