Suppr超能文献

疫苗豁免与政教问题。

Vaccine Exemptions and the Church-State Problem.

作者信息

Davis Dena S

机构信息

Lehigh University, College of Arts and Sciences, Religion Studies, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015 USA.

出版信息

J Clin Ethics. 2017 Fall;28(3):250-254.

Abstract

All of the 50 states of the United States have laws governing childhood vaccinations; 48 allow for religious exemptions, while 19 also offer exemptions based on some sort of personal philosophy. Recent disease outbreaks have caused these states to reconsider philosophical exemptions. However, we cannot, consistent with the U.S. Constitution, give preference to religion by creating religious exemptions only. The Constitution requires states to put religious and nonreligious claims on equal footing. Given the ubiquity of nonreligious objections to vaccination, I conclude that the best response is to remove all exemptions, as two states have already done. But removing exemptions should not end our concern for children. Removing exemptions only bars children from public schools; it still leaves them unvaccinated, a danger to others, and reliant on whatever nonpublic schooling is available. If public school attendance is not enough of an incentive for vaccine reluctant parents, perhaps we should look into stronger measures.

摘要

美国的50个州均有关于儿童疫苗接种的法律;48个州允许宗教豁免,19个州还提供基于某种个人理念的豁免。近期的疾病爆发促使这些州重新考虑基于个人理念的豁免。然而,根据美国宪法,我们不能仅通过设立宗教豁免来偏袒宗教。宪法要求各州平等对待宗教和非宗教主张。鉴于对疫苗接种存在普遍的非宗教反对意见,我得出的结论是,最佳应对措施是像两个州已经做的那样取消所有豁免。但取消豁免不应终结我们对儿童的关注。取消豁免只是禁止儿童进入公立学校;这仍会使他们未接种疫苗,对他人构成危险,并且依赖于任何可得的非公立学校教育。如果公立学校入学对不愿让孩子接种疫苗的家长来说激励不足,或许我们应该考虑采取更强有力的措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验