Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute; and the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law,∗ Chicago, IL.
J Pediatr. 2021 Apr;231:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.01.022. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
Mandatory school vaccination policies with exclusion of unvaccinated students can be a powerful tool in ensuring high vaccination rates. Some parents may object to mandatory vaccination policies, claiming exemptions based on medical, religious, or philosophical reasons. Individual schools, school systems, or local or regional governments have different policies with respect to whether, and what kind of, exemptions may be allowed. In the setting of the current pandemic, questions regarding the acceptability of exemptions have resurfaced, as schools and local governments struggle with how to safely return children to school. Anticipating that school attendance will be facilitated by the development of a vaccine, school systems will face decisions about whether to mandate vaccination and whether to permit exemptions. The American Academy of Pediatrics promulgates policy favoring the elimination of nonmedical exemptions generally in schools. This discussion considers whether schools should eliminate nonmedical exemptions to vaccination as proposed in the American Academy of Pediatrics policy, ultimately concluding that broad elimination of exemptions is not justified and advocating a more nuanced approach that encourages school attendance while promoting vaccination and broader public health goals.
强制学校接种疫苗政策,将未接种疫苗的学生排除在外,可以成为确保高疫苗接种率的有力工具。一些家长可能会反对强制接种疫苗政策,以医疗、宗教或哲学原因为由要求豁免。个别学校、学校系统或地方或地区政府在是否允许豁免以及允许什么样的豁免方面有不同的政策。在当前大流行的背景下,由于学校和地方政府正在努力寻找让儿童安全返校的方法,关于豁免的可接受性的问题再次出现。预计疫苗的开发将有助于学生返校,学校系统将面临是否强制接种疫苗以及是否允许豁免的决定。美国儿科学会颁布了一项政策,赞成在学校普遍取消非医学豁免。本讨论考虑了学校是否应该按照美国儿科学会的政策取消非医学豁免,最终得出结论认为,广泛取消豁免是没有道理的,并主张采取更细致入微的方法,在促进疫苗接种和更广泛的公共卫生目标的同时,鼓励学生上学。