Smith Adam R, Kitchen Shannon M, Toney Ryan M, Ziegler Christian
Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Luis Clement Ave., Bldg. 401 Tupper, Balboa Ancon, Panama, Republic of Panama.
J Insect Sci. 2017 Jan 1;17(2). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iex030.
Temporal niche partitioning may result from interference competition if animals shift their activity patterns to avoid aggressive competitors. If doing so also shifts food sources, it is difficult to distinguish the effects of interference and consumptive competition in selecting for temporal niche shift. Bees compete for pollen and nectar from flowers through both interference and consumptive competition, and some species of bees have evolved nocturnality. Here, we use tropical forest canopy towers to observe bees (the night-flying sweat bees Megalopta genalis and M. centralis [Halictidae], honey bees, and stingless bees [Apidae]) visiting flowers of the balsa tree (Ochroma pyramalidae, Malvaceae). Because Ochroma flowers are open in the late afternoon through the night we can test the relative influence of each competition type on temporal nice. Niche shift due to consumptive competition predicts that Megalopta forage when resources are available: from afternoon into the night. Niche shift due to interference competition predicts that Megalopta forage only in the absence of diurnal bees. We found no overlap between diurnal bees and Megalopta in the evening, and only one instance of overlap in the morning, despite the abundance of pollen and nectar in the late afternoon and evening. This supports the hypothesis that Megalopta are avoiding interference competition, but not the hypothesis that they are limited by consumptive competition. We propose that the release from interference competition enables Megalopta to provision cells quickly, and spend most of their time investing in nest defense. Thus, increases in foraging efficiency directly resulting from temporal shifts to escape interference competition may indirectly lead to reduced predation and parasitism.
如果动物改变其活动模式以避开具有攻击性的竞争者,时间生态位划分可能源于干扰竞争。如果这样做也会改变食物来源,那么在选择时间生态位转移时,就很难区分干扰竞争和消费竞争的影响。蜜蜂通过干扰竞争和消费竞争来争夺花朵中的花粉和花蜜,并且一些蜜蜂物种已经进化出夜行性。在这里,我们利用热带森林树冠塔来观察蜜蜂(夜间飞行的汗蜂Megalopta genalis和M. centralis [隧蜂科]、蜜蜂和无刺蜂[蜜蜂科])访问轻木树(Ochroma pyramalidae,锦葵科)的花朵。由于轻木花在傍晚至夜间开放,我们可以测试每种竞争类型对时间生态位的相对影响。由于消费竞争导致的生态位转移预测,Megalopta会在资源可用时觅食:从下午到夜间。由于干扰竞争导致的生态位转移预测,Megalopta只在没有日间活动的蜜蜂时觅食。我们发现,尽管在傍晚和夜间有大量的花粉和花蜜,但日间活动的蜜蜂和Megalopta在傍晚没有重叠,在早晨只有一个重叠实例。这支持了Megalopta避开干扰竞争的假设,但不支持它们受消费竞争限制的假设。我们提出,从干扰竞争中解脱出来使Megalopta能够迅速为蜂巢储备食物,并将大部分时间用于巢穴防御。因此,为逃避干扰竞争而进行时间转移直接导致的觅食效率提高,可能会间接减少捕食和寄生现象。