• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于儿童性虐待评估和调查的贝叶斯决策支持工具。

A Bayesian Decision-Support Tool for Child Sexual Abuse Assessment and Investigation.

机构信息

1 Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

2 University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2019 Jun;31(4):374-396. doi: 10.1177/1079063217732791. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1177/1079063217732791
PMID:28933247
Abstract

In assessments of child sexual abuse (CSA) allegations, informative background information is often overlooked or not used properly. We therefore created and tested an instrument that uses accessible background information to calculate the probability of a child being a CSA victim that can be used as a starting point in the following investigation. Studying 903 demographic and socioeconomic variables from over 11,000 Finnish children, we identified 42 features related to CSA. Using Bayesian logic to calculate the probability of abuse, our instrument-the Finnish Investigative Instrument of Child Sexual Abuse (FICSA)-has two separate profiles for boys and girls. A cross-validation procedure suggested excellent diagnostic utility (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.97 for boys and AUC = 0.88 for girls). We conclude that the presented method can be useful in forensic assessments of CSA allegations by adding a reliable statistical approach to considering background information, and to support clinical decision making and guide investigative efforts.

摘要

在儿童性虐待(CSA)指控的评估中,有价值的背景信息经常被忽视或没有得到妥善利用。因此,我们创建并测试了一种利用可获取的背景信息来计算儿童成为 CSA 受害者的可能性的工具,该工具可作为后续调查的起点。我们研究了来自 11000 多名芬兰儿童的 903 个人口统计学和社会经济学变量,确定了 42 个与 CSA 相关的特征。我们的工具——芬兰儿童性虐待调查工具(FICSA)——使用贝叶斯逻辑计算虐待的概率,针对男孩和女孩有两个独立的档案。交叉验证程序表明其具有出色的诊断效用(男孩的曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.97,女孩的 AUC = 0.88)。我们得出结论,通过将可靠的统计方法应用于考虑背景信息,并支持临床决策制定和指导调查工作,该方法可用于 CSA 指控的法医评估。

相似文献

1
A Bayesian Decision-Support Tool for Child Sexual Abuse Assessment and Investigation.用于儿童性虐待评估和调查的贝叶斯决策支持工具。
Sex Abuse. 2019 Jun;31(4):374-396. doi: 10.1177/1079063217732791. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
The assessment of child sexual abuse allegations: using research to guide clinical decision making.儿童性虐待指控的评估:运用研究指导临床决策
Behav Sci Law. 1998 Winter;16(1):21-34. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199824)16:1<21::aid-bsl291>3.0.co;2-k.
3
Child sexual abuse - Initial suspicion and legal outcome.儿童性虐待 - 初步怀疑与法律结果。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Oct;291:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Base rates, multiple indicators, and comprehensive forensic evaluations: why sexualized behavior still counts in assessments of child sexual abuse allegations.基础概率、多项指标与全面的法医评估:为何在儿童性虐待指控评估中性化行为仍然重要。
J Child Sex Abus. 2012;21(1):45-71. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2012.642470.
5
Child sexual abuse--Medical statement conclusions in criminal legal process.儿童性虐待——刑事法律程序中的医学声明结论
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Jun;239:31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
6
Child advocacy center multidisciplinary team decision and its association to child protective services outcomes.儿童权益保护中心多学科团队决策及其与儿童保护服务结果的关联。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Aug;46:174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 7.
7
Children's disclosure of sexual abuse during early forensic psychiatric evaluation in Southern Taiwan.台湾南部儿童在早期法医精神病学评估期间对性虐待的披露。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 Dec;115(12):1069-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Improving decision making in forensic child sexual abuse evaluations.提高法医儿童性虐待评估中的决策能力。
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Feb;29(1):87-120. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-1400-8.
9
Judges' views of child sexual abuse: evaluating beliefs against research findings in a Finnish sample.法官对儿童性虐待的看法:在芬兰样本中对照研究结果评估信念
Scand J Psychol. 2014 Oct;55(5):497-504. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12147. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
10
The value of paediatric assessment in historic child sexual abuse.儿童期性虐待史中儿科评估的价值
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Jun;102(6):550-555. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311989. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Child Abuse, Misdiagnosed by an Expertise Center-Part II-Misuse of Bayes' Theorem.儿童虐待,被一个专业中心误诊——第二部分——贝叶斯定理的误用
Children (Basel). 2023 May 6;10(5):843. doi: 10.3390/children10050843.
2
Genetic Vulnerability to Experiencing Child Maltreatment.遭受儿童虐待的遗传易感性。
Front Genet. 2019 Sep 17;10:852. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00852. eCollection 2019.