Suppr超能文献

三维图像融合技术在经皮腔内血管成形术及髂动脉闭塞支架置入术中的应用:技术验证及文献系统评价

The use of 3D image fusion for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of iliac artery obstructions: validation of the technique and systematic review of literature.

作者信息

Goudeketting Seline R, Heinen Stefan G, van den Heuvel Daniel A, van Strijen Marco J, de Haan Michiel W, Slump Cornelis H, de Vries Jean-Paul P

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Feb;59(1):26-36. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.17.10224-7. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The effect of the insertion of guidewires and catheters on fusion accuracy of the three-dimensional (3D) image fusion technique during iliac percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) procedures has not yet been investigated.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Technical validation of the 3D fusion technique was evaluated in 11 patients with common and/or external iliac artery lesions. A preprocedural contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiogram (CE-MRA) was segmented and manually registered to a cone-beam computed tomography image created at the beginning of the procedure for each patient. The treating physician visually scored the fusion accuracy (i.e., accurate [<2 mm], mismatch [2-5 mm], or inaccurate [>5 mm]) of the entire vasculature of the overlay with respect to the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) directly after the first obtained DSA. Contours of the vasculature of the fusion images and DSAs were drawn after the procedure. The cranial-caudal, lateral-medial, and absolute displacement were calculated between the vessel centerlines. To determine the influence of the catheters, displacement of the catheterized iliac trajectories were compared with the noncatheterized trajectories. Electronic databases were systematically searched for available literature published between January 2010 till August 2017.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The mean registration error for all iliac trajectories (N.=20) was small (4.0±2.5 mm). No significant difference in fusion displacement was observed between catheterized (N.=11) and noncatheterized (N.=9) iliac arteries. The systematic literature search yielded 2 manuscripts with a total of 22 patients. The methodological quality of these studies was poor (≤11 MINORS Score), mainly due to a lack of a control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate image fusion based on preprocedural CE-MRA is possible and could potentially be of help in iliac PTA procedures. The flexible guidewires and angiographic catheters, routinely used during endovascular procedures of iliac arteries, did not cause significant displacement that influenced the image fusion. Current literature on 3D image fusion in iliac PTA procedures is of limited methodological quality.

摘要

引言

在髂动脉经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)过程中,导丝和导管的插入对三维(3D)图像融合技术的融合准确性的影响尚未得到研究。

证据获取

对11例髂总动脉和/或髂外动脉病变患者进行了3D融合技术的技术验证。对术前对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)进行分割,并手动将其与为每位患者在手术开始时创建的锥形束计算机断层扫描图像配准。在首次获得数字减影血管造影(DSA)后,治疗医师直观地评估叠加的整个脉管系统相对于DSA的融合准确性(即准确[<2 mm]、不匹配[2 - 5 mm]或不准确[>5 mm])。术后绘制融合图像和DSA的脉管系统轮廓。计算血管中心线之间的头-尾、外侧-内侧和绝对位移。为了确定导管的影响,将导管插入的髂动脉轨迹的位移与未插入导管的轨迹进行比较。系统检索电子数据库,以查找2010年1月至2017年8月期间发表的可用文献。

证据综合

所有髂动脉轨迹(N = 20)的平均配准误差较小(4.0±2.5 mm)。在插入导管的(N = 11)和未插入导管的(N = 9)髂动脉之间,未观察到融合位移的显著差异。系统文献检索产生了2篇手稿,共22例患者。这些研究的方法学质量较差(≤11分的MINORS评分),主要是由于缺乏对照组。

结论

基于术前CE-MRA的准确图像融合是可行的,并且可能有助于髂动脉PTA手术。在髂动脉血管内手术中常规使用的柔性导丝和血管造影导管不会引起影响图像融合的显著位移。目前关于髂动脉PTA手术中3D图像融合的文献方法学质量有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验