Erasmus Center of Behavioural Ethics, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.
Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Feb;103(2):164-181. doi: 10.1037/apl0000260. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
Research shows that power can lead to prosocial behavior by facilitating the behavioral expression of dispositional prosocial motivation. However, it is not clear how power may facilitate responses to contextual factors that promote prosocial motivation. Integrating fairness heuristic theory and the situated focus theory of power, we argue that in particular, organization members in lower (vs. higher) hierarchical positions who simultaneously experience a high (vs. low) sense of power respond with prosocial behavior to 1 important antecedent of prosocial motivation, that is, the enactment of procedural justice. The results from a multisource survey among employees and their leaders from various organizations (Study 1) and an experiment using a public goods dilemma (Study 2) support this prediction. Three subsequent experiments (Studies 3-5) show that this effect is mediated by perceptions of authority trustworthiness. Taken together, this research (a) helps resolve the debate regarding whether power promotes or undermines prosocial behavior, (b) demonstrates that hierarchical position and the sense of power can have very different effects on processes that are vital to the functioning of an organization, and (c) helps solve ambiguity regarding the roles of hierarchical position and power in fairness heuristic theory. (PsycINFO Database Record
研究表明,权力通过促进性格亲社会动机的行为表现,从而导致亲社会行为。然而,权力如何促进促进亲社会动机的背景因素的反应尚不清楚。我们结合公平启发式理论和权力的情境焦点理论,认为特别是在同时感受到高度(相对于低度)权力的低(相对于高)层级组织成员中,他们会以亲社会行为回应亲社会动机的一个重要前因,即程序正义的实施。来自不同组织的员工及其领导的多源调查(研究 1)和使用公共物品困境的实验(研究 2)的结果支持了这一预测。随后进行的三项实验(研究 3-5)表明,这种效应是由对权威可信度的感知介导的。总之,这项研究(a)有助于解决关于权力是促进还是破坏亲社会行为的争论,(b)表明层级地位和权力感对组织运作至关重要的过程可能具有非常不同的影响,(c)有助于解决公平启发式理论中层级地位和权力的作用的模糊性。