a Seattle Children's Hospital, Center for Clinical and Translational Research , Seattle , Washington , USA.
b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research Division , Seattle , Washington , USA.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2018 Mar-Apr;36(2):137-144. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2017.1382646. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
We aimed to explore the predictive value of screening for distress alone, hope alone, or a combination of both. In a multicenter prospective study, 37 English-speaking adolescents and young adults with cancer and 40 parents completed validated instruments at diagnosis ("baseline") and 3-6 months later ("follow-up"). Correlated regression models described associations. Within each instrument, baseline and follow-up scores were associated. However, only a composite hope/distress score predicted all three patient-centered outcomes. Multidimensional screens incorporating positive and negative psychosocial constructs may predict patient-centered outcomes better than isolated, single-construct instruments.
我们旨在探讨单独筛查困扰、希望或两者结合的预测价值。在一项多中心前瞻性研究中,37 名讲英语的癌症青少年和年轻患者及其 40 名家长在诊断时(“基线”)和 3-6 个月后(“随访”)完成了经过验证的工具。相关回归模型描述了相关性。在每个工具中,基线和随访评分相关。然而,只有希望/困扰综合评分能预测所有三个以患者为中心的结局。包含积极和消极心理社会结构的多维筛查可能比孤立的单一结构工具更好地预测以患者为中心的结局。