Assari Shervin
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Center for Research on Ethnicity, Culture, and Health, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, 2858 SPH1, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Sep 21;7(4):64. doi: 10.3390/bs7040064.
Cultural and ethnic differences in psychosocial and medical correlates of negative affect are well documented. This study aimed to compare blacks and whites for the predictive role of baseline neuroticism (N) on subsequent risk of major depressive episodes (MDD) 25 years later. Data came from the Americans' Changing Lives (ACL) Study, 1986-2011. We used data on 1219 individuals (847 whites and 372 blacks) who had data on baseline N in 1986 and future MDD in 2011. The main predictor of interest was baseline N, measured using three items in 1986. The main outcome was 12 months MDD measured using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) at 2011. Covariates included baseline demographics (age and gender), socioeconomics (education and income), depressive symptoms [Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)], stress, health behaviors (smoking and driking), and physical health [chronic medical conditions, obesity, and self-rated health (SRH)] measured in 1986. Logistic regressions were used to test the predictive role of baseline N on subsequent risk of MDD 25 years later, net of covariates. The models were estimated in the pooled sample, as well as blacks and whites. In the pooled sample, baseline N predicted subsequent risk of MDD 25 years later (OR = 2.23, 95%CI = 1.14-4.34), net of covariates. We also found a marginally significant interaction between race and baseline N on subsequent risk of MDD (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.12-1.12), suggesting a stronger effect for whites compared to blacks. In race-specific models, among whites (OR = 2.55; 95% CI = 1.22-5.32) but not blacks (OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.24-3.39), baseline N predicted subsequent risk of MDD. Black-white differences in socioeconomics and physical health could not explain the racial differences in the link between N and MDD. Blacks and whites differ in the salience of baseline N as a psychological determinant of MDD risk over a long period of time. This finding supports the cultural moderation hypothesis and is in line with other previously reported black-white differences in social, psychological, and medical correlates of negative affect and depression.
消极情绪的社会心理和医学关联方面的文化及种族差异已有充分记载。本研究旨在比较黑人和白人,探讨基线神经质(N)对25年后发生重度抑郁发作(MDD)后续风险的预测作用。数据来自1986 - 2011年的“美国人生活变化”(ACL)研究。我们使用了1219名个体(847名白人及372名黑人)的数据,这些个体在1986年有基线N的数据以及在2011年有未来MDD的数据。主要的研究预测因素是1986年使用三个项目测量的基线N。主要结果是2011年使用复合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)测量的12个月MDD。协变量包括1986年测量的基线人口统计学特征(年龄和性别)、社会经济学因素(教育程度和收入)、抑郁症状[流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES - D)]、压力、健康行为(吸烟和饮酒)以及身体健康状况[慢性疾病、肥胖和自评健康(SRH)]。使用逻辑回归来检验基线N在扣除协变量后对25年后MDD后续风险的预测作用。模型在合并样本以及黑人和白人样本中进行估计。在合并样本中,扣除协变量后,基线N预测了25年后MDD的后续风险(OR = 2.23,95%CI = 1.14 - 4.34)。我们还发现种族与基线N在MDD后续风险上存在边缘显著的交互作用(OR = 0.37,95%CI = 0.12 - 1.12),表明白人的影响比黑人更强。在种族特异性模型中,基线N在白人中(OR = 2.55;95%CI = 1.22 - 5.32)而非黑人中(OR = 0.90;95%CI = 0.24 - 3.39)预测了MDD的后续风险。社会经济学和身体健康方面的黑白差异无法解释N与MDD之间联系的种族差异。黑人和白人在作为长期MDD风险心理决定因素的基线N的显著性方面存在差异。这一发现支持了文化调节假说,并且与先前报道的关于消极情绪和抑郁的社会、心理及医学关联方面的其他黑白差异一致。