Assari Shervin, Moazen-Zadeh Ehsan
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Center for Research on Ethnicity, Culture, and Health, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Medicine and Health Promotion Institute, Tehran, Iran; Mental Health Research Center, Tehran Psychiatric Institute, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Front Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 18;7:53. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00053. eCollection 2016.
The degree by which depressive symptoms and clinical depression reflect each other may vary across populations. The present study compared Blacks and Whites for the magnitude of the cross-sectional associations between various domains of depressive symptoms and endorsement of clinical disorders of depression.
Data came from the National Survey of American Life, 2001-2003. We included 3570 Black (African-Americans) and 891 Non-Hispanic Whites. Predictors were positive affect, negative affect, and interpersonal problems measured using the 12-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Outcomes were lifetime major depressive disorder (MDD), lifetime major depressive episode (MDE), 12-month MDE, 30-day MDE, and 30-day major depressive disorder with hierarchy (MDDH) based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Logistic regression models were applied in the pooled sample as well as Blacks and Whites.
Regarding CES-D, Blacks had lower total scores, positive affect, negative affect, and interpersonal problems compared to Whites (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Blacks also had lower odds of meeting criteria for lifetime MDD and MDE, 12-month MDE, and 30-day MDE and MDDH (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). For most depressive diagnoses, ethnicity showed a positive and significant interaction with the negative affect and interpersonal problems domains, suggesting stronger associations for Blacks compared to Whites. The CES-D total score and CES-D positive affect domain did not interact with ethnicity on CIDI-based depressive diagnoses.
Stronger associations between multiple domains of depressive symptoms and clinical depression may be due to higher severity of depression among Blacks, when they endorse the CIDI criteria for the disorder. This finding may explain some of previously observed ethnic differences in social, psychological, and medical correlates of depressive symptoms and clinical depression in the general population as well as clinical settings.
抑郁症状与临床抑郁症相互反映的程度可能因人群而异。本研究比较了黑人和白人在抑郁症状各领域与抑郁症临床障碍确诊之间的横断面关联程度。
数据来自2001 - 2003年美国生活全国调查。我们纳入了3570名黑人(非裔美国人)和891名非西班牙裔白人。预测因素为使用12项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES - D)测量的积极情绪、消极情绪和人际问题。结果指标为基于综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)的终生重度抑郁症(MDD)、终生重度抑郁发作(MDE)、12个月MDE、30天MDE以及30天分级重度抑郁症(MDDH)。在合并样本以及黑人和白人中应用逻辑回归模型。
关于CES - D,与白人相比,黑人的总分、积极情绪、消极情绪和人际问题得分更低(所有比较p < 0.05)。黑人达到终生MDD和MDE、12个月MDE以及30天MDE和MDDH标准的几率也更低(所有比较p < 0.05)。对于大多数抑郁诊断,种族与消极情绪和人际问题领域显示出显著的正向交互作用,表明黑人与白人相比关联更强。CES - D总分和CES - D积极情绪领域在基于CIDI的抑郁诊断上与种族没有交互作用。
当黑人认可该障碍的CIDI标准时,抑郁症状多领域与临床抑郁症之间更强的关联可能是由于黑人抑郁症的严重程度更高。这一发现可能解释了先前在一般人群以及临床环境中观察到的抑郁症状和临床抑郁症在社会、心理和医学相关因素方面的一些种族差异。