Kroon Laurie M G de, Davidson Esmeralda N Blaney, Narcisi Roberto, Farrell Eric, Kraan Peter M van der, van Osch Gerjo J V M
1 Department of Rheumatology, Experimental Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Cartilage. 2017 Oct;8(4):432-438. doi: 10.1177/1947603516667585. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
Objective Previously, we demonstrated the importance of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ)-activated SMAD2/3 signaling in chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). However, TGFβ also signals via the SMAD1/5/9 pathway, which is known to induce terminal differentiation of BMSCs. In this study, we investigated whether other SMAD2/3-activating ligands, Activin and Nodal, can induce chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs without inducing terminal differentiation. Design Activation of SMAD2/3 signaling and chondrogenesis were evaluated in human BMSCs ( N = 3 donors) stimulated with TGFβ, Activin, or Nodal. SMAD2/3 activation was assessed by determining phosphorylated-SMAD2 (pSMAD2) protein levels and SMAD2/3-target gene expression of SERPINE1. Chondrogenesis was determined by ACAN and COL2A1 transcript analysis and histological examination of proteoglycans and collagen type II. Results Both Activin and TGFβ enhanced pSMAD2 and SERPINE1 expression compared to the control condition without growth factors, demonstrating activated SMAD2/3 signaling. pSMAD2 and SERPINE1 had a higher level of expression following stimulation with TGFβ than with Activin, while Nodal did not activate SMAD2/3 signaling. Of the 3 ligands tested, only TGFβ induced chondrogenic differentiation as shown by strongly increased transcript levels of ACAN and COL2A1 and positive histological staining of proteoglycans and collagen type II. Conclusions Even with concentrations up to 25 times higher than that of TGFβ, Activin and Nodal do not induce chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs; thus, neither of the 2 ligands is an interesting alternative candidate for TGFβ to induce chondrogenesis without terminal differentiation. To obtain stable cartilage formation by BMSCs, future studies should decipher how TGFβ-induced terminal differentiation can be prevented.
目的 此前,我们已证明转化生长因子-β(TGFβ)激活的SMAD2/3信号在骨髓间充质干细胞(BMSC)软骨形成中的重要性。然而,TGFβ也通过SMAD1/5/9信号通路传导,已知该通路可诱导BMSC的终末分化。在本研究中,我们调查了其他激活SMAD2/3的配体激活素(Activin)和节点蛋白(Nodal)是否能诱导BMSC的软骨分化而不诱导终末分化。
设计 在用人TGFβ、激活素或节点蛋白刺激的人BMSC(N = 3名供体)中评估SMAD2/3信号的激活和软骨形成。通过测定磷酸化SMAD2(pSMAD2)蛋白水平和SERPINE1的SMAD2/3靶基因表达来评估SMAD2/3的激活。通过ACAN和COL2A1转录分析以及蛋白聚糖和II型胶原的组织学检查来确定软骨形成。
结果 与无生长因子的对照条件相比,激活素和TGFβ均增强了pSMAD2和SERPINE1的表达,表明SMAD2/3信号被激活。TGFβ刺激后pSMAD2和SERPINE1的表达水平高于激活素,而节点蛋白未激活SMAD2/3信号。在所测试的3种配体中,只有TGFβ诱导了软骨分化,表现为ACAN和COL2A1转录水平显著增加以及蛋白聚糖和II型胶原的组织学染色呈阳性。
结论 即使激活素和节点蛋白的浓度比TGFβ高25倍,它们也不会诱导BMSC的软骨分化;因此,这两种配体都不是TGFβ诱导软骨形成而不发生终末分化的理想替代候选物。为了通过BMSC获得稳定的软骨形成,未来的研究应阐明如何防止TGFβ诱导的终末分化。