• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性、亚急性和晚期吸收支架血栓形成的临床、血管造影和操作相关性。

Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Correlates of Acute, Subacute, and Late Absorb Scaffold Thrombosis.

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1809-1815. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.067.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.067
PMID:28935071
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to identify and verify independent correlates of device thrombosis from an analysis of multicenter trials and registries.

BACKGROUND

Recent analyses suggest an increased risk of device thrombosis with Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) implantation compared with metallic drug-eluting stents, and data from moderate size studies suggest a risk relationship to vessel size and technique.

METHODS

From 8,771 consecutively treated patients, 105 patients (1.2%) were identified with scaffold thrombosis within 1 year of implantation. They were matched 2:1 with controls selected randomly from nonthrombosis patients. Data-restricted multiple logistic analysis was used to identify significant independent covariates of the outcome.

RESULTS

Early (within 1 month) scaffold thrombosis occurred in 69 patients and late (1 to 12 months) thrombosis occurred in 36 patients. Modelling found significant correlations of thrombosis to be final minimal lumen diameter <1.85 mm (odds ratio [OR]: 3.1; p = 0.004), off dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) status (OR: 3.1 to 3.5; p = 0.006 to 0.053), no post-dilatation with >1.1:1 balloon/scaffold ratio (OR: 2.3; p = 0.022), and reference vessel diameter <2.40 mm (OR: 2.1; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal vessel sizing, procedural technique, angiographic outcomes, and dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation appear to be the principal determinants of Absorb scaffold thrombosis risk through 12 months after implantation.

摘要

目的

作者试图从多中心试验和注册研究中分析确定并验证器械血栓形成的独立相关因素。

背景

最近的分析表明,与金属药物洗脱支架相比,Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架(雅培血管,加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉)植入后器械血栓形成的风险增加,并且来自中等规模研究的数据表明与血管大小和技术存在风险关系。

方法

在 8771 例连续治疗的患者中,有 105 例(1.2%)在植入后 1 年内发生支架血栓形成。他们与随机从非血栓形成患者中选择的对照组以 2:1 的比例匹配。使用数据受限的多因素逻辑回归分析来确定结果的显著独立协变量。

结果

早期(1 个月内)支架血栓形成发生在 69 例患者中,晚期(1 至 12 个月)支架血栓形成发生在 36 例患者中。模型发现血栓形成与最终最小管腔直径<1.85 mm(优势比[OR]:3.1;p = 0.004)、双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)状态(OR:3.1 至 3.5;p = 0.006 至 0.053)、后扩张时>1.1:1 球囊/支架比(OR:2.3;p = 0.022)和参考血管直径<2.40 mm(OR:2.1;p = 0.036)显著相关。

结论

在植入后 12 个月内,血管尺寸不理想、手术技术、血管造影结果和双重抗血小板治疗停药似乎是 Absorb 支架血栓形成风险的主要决定因素。

相似文献

1
Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Correlates of Acute, Subacute, and Late Absorb Scaffold Thrombosis.急性、亚急性和晚期吸收支架血栓形成的临床、血管造影和操作相关性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1809-1815. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.067.
2
Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Correlates of Very Late Absorb Scaffold Thrombosis: Multistudy Registry Results.非常晚期吸收支架血栓形成的临床、血管造影和操作相关因素:多研究注册结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 9;11(7):638-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.042.
3
Incidence and short-term clinical outcomes of small side branch occlusion after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: an interim report of 435 patients in the ABSORB-EXTEND single-arm trial in comparison with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent in the SPIRIT first and II trials.在 ABSORB-EXTEND 单臂试验中,435 例患者接受依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗后小分支闭塞的发生率及短期临床结局:与 SPIRIT 试验 I 和 II 中依维莫司洗脱金属支架的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):247-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.013.
4
Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging.随机比较 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架和 Mirage 微纤维西罗莫司洗脱支架的多模式影像学研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 12;10(11):1115-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 May 17.
5
Bioresorbable scaffolds compared with everolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of chronic coronary total occlusion: clinical and angiographic results of a matched paired comparison.生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗慢性冠状动脉完全闭塞的比较:配对比较的临床和血管造影结果
Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Mar;28(2):120-125. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000449.
6
Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).植入可吸收依维莫司洗脱完全生物可吸收血管支架后急性支架断裂和晚期结构不连续性的发生率和影像学结果:ABSORB 队列 B 试验的光学相干断层成像评估(生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变患者的临床评价)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(12):1400-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.016.
7
Correlates and outcomes of late and very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from DESERT (International Drug-Eluting Stent Event Registry of Thrombosis).晚期和极晚期药物洗脱支架血栓形成的相关因素和结果:DESERT(国际药物洗脱支架血栓形成事件注册研究)的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct;7(10):1093-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.017. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
8
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
9
Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial.经全吸收聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架冠状动脉植入治疗初发冠状动脉疾病患者的 5 年临床和功能多层螺旋 CT 血管造影结果:ABSORB 队列 A 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.017.
10
Routine use of optical coherence tomography in bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: insights on technique optimization and long-term outcomes.光学相干断层扫描在生物可吸收血管支架植入中的常规应用:技术优化及长期结果的见解
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Jun;30(4):263-269. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000736.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioresorbable scaffolds advances, challenges, and future directions.生物可吸收支架的进展、挑战及未来方向。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 22;87(7):4173-4183. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003424. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Outcomes of the two generations of bioresorbable scaffolds (Magmaris vs. Absorb) in acute coronary syndrome in routine clinical practice.两代生物可吸收支架(Magmaris与Absorb)在急性冠状动脉综合征常规临床实践中的结果。
Cardiol J. 2022 May 27;30(6):870-80. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0047.
3
Applying Principles of Regenerative Medicine to Vascular Stent Development.
将再生医学原理应用于血管支架研发。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 7;10:826807. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.826807. eCollection 2022.
4
Scaffold underexpansion and late lumen loss after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: Insights from ABSORB JAPAN trial.生物可吸收支架植入后支架扩张不足和晚期管腔丢失:来自ABSORB日本试验的见解。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Sep 4;31:100623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100623. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
A scoring system to predict the occurrence of very late stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.用于预测急性冠脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后极晚期支架血栓形成的评分系统。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63455-0.
6
A case report of a recurrent early and late Bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis: serial angiography and optical coherence tomography findings.一篇关于生物可吸收血管支架早期和晚期反复血栓形成的病例报告:系列血管造影和光学相干断层成像发现。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01426-z.
7
Incidental Finding of Strut Malapposition Is a Predictor of Late and Very Late Thrombosis in Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffolds.支架贴壁不良的偶然发现是冠状动脉生物可吸收支架晚期和极晚期血栓形成的预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 27;8(5):580. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050580.
8
Bioabsorbable stents: only bad news?生物可吸收支架:全是坏消息吗?
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Mar;21(Suppl B):B28-B30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz009. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
9
Long-term clinical results of biodegradable vascular scaffold ABSORB BVS™ using the PSP-technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome.采用PSP技术的可生物降解血管支架ABSORB BVS™治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期临床结果。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(6):677-684. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0018. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
10
Guided de-escalation of DAPT in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with BVS implantation: a post-hoc analysis from the randomized TROPICAL-ACS trial.指导急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴生物可吸收支架植入术后的 DAPT 降级:随机 TROPICAL-ACS 试验的事后分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Apr;47(3):427-435. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01811-2.