BioMEMS Lab, University of Applied Sciences Aschaffenburg, 63743 Aschaffenburg, Germany.
Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Jan 1;293:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
Synchrony within neuronal networks is thought to be a fundamental feature of neuronal networks. In order to quantify synchrony between spike trains, various synchrony measures were developed. Most of them are time scale dependent and thus require the setting of an appropriate time scale. Recently, alternative methods have been developed, such as the time scale independent SPIKE-distance by Kreuz et al.
In this study, a novel time-scale independent spike train synchrony measure called Spike-contrast is proposed. The algorithm is based on the temporal "contrast" (activity vs. non-activity in certain temporal bins) and not only provides a single synchrony value, but also a synchrony curve as a function of the bin size.
For most test data sets synchrony values obtained with Spike-contrast are highly correlated with those of the SPIKE-distance (Spearman correlation value of 0.99). Correlation was lower for data containing multiple time scales (Spearman correlation value of 0.89). When analyzing large sets of data, Spike-contrast performed faster.
Spike-contrast is compared to the SPIKE-distance algorithm. The test data consisted of artificial spike trains with various levels of synchrony, including Poisson spike trains and bursts, spike trains from simulated neuronal Izhikevich networks, and bursts made of smaller bursts (sub-bursts).
The high correlation of Spike-contrast with the established SPIKE-distance for most test data, suggests the suitability of the proposed measure. Both measures are complementary as SPIKE-distance provides a synchrony profile over time, whereas Spike-contrast provides a synchrony curve over bin size.
神经元网络中的同步被认为是神经元网络的基本特征。为了量化尖峰序列之间的同步,开发了各种同步度量。它们中的大多数依赖于时间尺度,因此需要设置适当的时间尺度。最近,已经开发了替代方法,例如 Kreuz 等人提出的时间尺度独立的 SPIKE-distance。
在这项研究中,提出了一种新的时间尺度独立的尖峰序列同步度量方法,称为 Spike-contrast。该算法基于时间上的“对比”(某些时间窗内的活动与非活动),不仅提供单个同步值,还提供作为时间窗大小函数的同步曲线。
对于大多数测试数据集,Spike-contrast 获得的同步值与 SPIKE-distance 高度相关(Spearman 相关系数为 0.99)。对于包含多个时间尺度的数据,相关性较低(Spearman 相关系数为 0.89)。当分析大量数据集时,Spike-contrast 执行速度更快。
Spike-contrast 与 SPIKE-distance 算法进行了比较。测试数据由具有不同同步水平的人工尖峰序列组成,包括泊松尖峰序列和爆发,来自模拟神经元 Izhikevich 网络的尖峰序列,以及由较小爆发(子爆发)组成的爆发。
对于大多数测试数据,Spike-contrast 与已建立的 SPIKE-distance 高度相关,表明所提出的度量方法的适用性。两种方法都是互补的,因为 SPIKE-distance 提供了随时间的同步分布,而 Spike-contrast 提供了随时间窗大小的同步曲线。