• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度环境下早产儿肌张力的角度测量评估及胎龄对其成熟度的影响

Goniometric Assessment of Muscle Tone of Preterm Infants and Impact of Gestational Age on Its Maturation in Indian Setting.

作者信息

Farmania Rajni, Sitaraman S, Das Rashmi Ranjan

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Pediatrics, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017 Aug;8(Suppl 1):S44-S48. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_417_16.

DOI:10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_417_16
PMID:28936071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5602260/
Abstract

CONTEXT

The normative data on muscle tone of preterm infants by goniometric assessment in Indian setting are scarce.

AIM

The aim of this study it to provide a normative objective data of muscle tone of preterm infants by gestation using goniometer.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a prospective, observational study including preterm infants admitted in a tertiary care hospital from North India.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The objective dimension of muscle tone assessment of 204 healthy preterm infants was done; 61 infants completed follow-up till 40 weeks' postconceptional age (PCA) and were compared to term infants.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

SPSS (version 16.0) was used. The intergroup comparison was done through ANOVA, and the localization of differences between the groups was determined through multiple comparisons by post hoc test.

RESULTS

Mean gestational age was 34.3 ± 1.7 weeks. Angles were as follows: adductor = 100.1 ± 8.7, popliteal = 118.9 ± 8.6, dorsiflexion = 39.0 ± 9.0, heel to ear = 121.90 ± 7.90, wrist flexion = 46.0 ± 10.2, and arm recoil = 122.2° ± 16.6°. The evolution of muscle tone as indicated by heel-to-ear angle shows progressive maturation from 32 weeks' gestation while adductor angle, popliteal angle, and arm recoil mature predominantly after 36 weeks' gestation. Comparison of preterm infants to term at 40 weeks' PCA demonstrated significantly less tone in all except posture and heel to ear.

CONCLUSIONS

Goniometric assessment provides a objective normative data of muscle tone for preterm infants. Maturation of heel to ear and posture evolves from 32 weeks onwards and are the earliest neurologic marker to mature in preterm infants independent of the gestational age at birth.

摘要

背景

在印度环境下,通过角度测量法评估早产儿肌张力的规范性数据稀缺。

目的

本研究的目的是使用角度测量仪提供按孕周划分的早产儿肌张力的规范性客观数据。

设置与设计

这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了印度北部一家三级护理医院收治的早产儿。

研究对象与方法

对204名健康早产儿进行了肌张力评估的客观测量;61名婴儿完成了直至孕龄40周的随访,并与足月儿进行了比较。

所用统计分析方法

使用SPSS(版本16.0)。组间比较通过方差分析进行,组间差异的定位通过事后检验的多重比较来确定。

结果

平均孕周为34.3±1.7周。角度如下:内收肌 = 100.1±8.7,腘窝 = 118.9±8.6,背屈 = 39.0±9.0,足跟至耳部 = 121.90±7.90,腕部屈曲 = 46.0±10.2,以及手臂回缩 = 122.2°±16.6°。足跟至耳部角度所显示的肌张力演变表明,从孕32周开始逐渐成熟,而内收肌角度、腘窝角度和手臂回缩主要在孕36周后成熟。在孕龄40周时,将早产儿与足月儿进行比较,结果显示除姿势和足跟至耳部外,所有方面的肌张力均显著较低。

结论

角度测量评估为早产儿提供了肌张力的客观规范性数据。足跟至耳部和姿势的成熟从孕32周开始,是早产儿中最早成熟的神经学标志物,与出生时的孕周无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/068a/5602260/203606ddbda0/JNRP-8-44-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/068a/5602260/203606ddbda0/JNRP-8-44-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/068a/5602260/203606ddbda0/JNRP-8-44-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Goniometric Assessment of Muscle Tone of Preterm Infants and Impact of Gestational Age on Its Maturation in Indian Setting.印度环境下早产儿肌张力的角度测量评估及胎龄对其成熟度的影响
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017 Aug;8(Suppl 1):S44-S48. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_417_16.
2
The influence of gestational age and birth weight in the clinical assessment of the muscle tone of healthy term and preterm newborns.胎龄和出生体重对健康足月儿和早产儿肌张力临床评估的影响。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2005 Dec;63(4):956-62. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2005000600010. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
3
Agreement between visual and goniometric assessments of adductor and popliteal angles in infants.婴儿内收肌角与腘角的视觉评估和角度测量评估之间的一致性。
J Pediatr Neurosci. 2013 May;8(2):93-6. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.117834.
4
Neurologic examination of preterm infants at term age: comparison with term infants.足月儿期早产儿的神经学检查:与足月儿的比较。
J Pediatr. 2003 Jun;142(6):647-55. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2003.215.
5
Neurological and neurobehavioural differences between preterm infants at term and full-term newborn infants.足月儿与足月新生儿之间的神经学和神经行为差异。
Neuropediatrics. 1982 Nov;13(4):183-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1059620.
6
Development of preterm infants: feeding behaviors and brazelton neonatal behavioral assessment scale at 40 and 44 weeks' postconceptional age.早产儿的发育:孕龄40周和44周时的喂养行为及布雷泽尔顿新生儿行为评估量表
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2005 Oct-Dec;28(4):356-63. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200510000-00007.
7
Does parenchymal brain injury affect biobehavioral pain responses in very low birth weight infants at 32 weeks' postconceptional age?孕龄32周的极低出生体重儿的脑实质损伤是否会影响其生物行为学疼痛反应?
Pediatrics. 2002 Sep;110(3):570-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.570.
8
Visual function at 35 and 40 weeks' postmenstrual age in low-risk preterm infants.低风险早产儿孕龄35周和40周时的视觉功能。
Pediatrics. 2008 Dec;122(6):e1193-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1888.
9
Neurobehaviour and neurological development in the first month after birth for infants born between 32-42 weeks' gestation.孕32至42周出生婴儿出生后第一个月的神经行为和神经发育
Early Hum Dev. 2016 May;96:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
10
Survival, Hospitalization, and Acute-Care Costs of Very and Moderate Preterm Infants in the First 6 Years of Life: A Population-Based Study.极早产和中度早产儿生命最初6年的生存、住院情况及急性护理费用:一项基于人群的研究
J Pediatr. 2016 Feb;169:61-8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.10.028. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Factor Analysis of the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease and Healthy Controls.先天性心脏病患儿与健康对照儿的爱因斯坦新生儿神经行为评估量表的因子分析。
J Child Neurol. 2022 Oct;37(10-11):851-863. doi: 10.1177/08830738221115982. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurological assessment of preterm infants for predicting neuromotor status at 2 years: results from the LIFT cohort.对早产儿进行神经学评估以预测 2 岁时的神经运动状态:来自 LIFT 队列的研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 22;3(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002431. Print 2013.
2
Prediction of developmental performance in preterm infants at two years of corrected age: contribution of the neurological assessment at term age.预测早产儿在纠正 2 岁时的发育表现:足月时神经评估的贡献。
Early Hum Dev. 2011 Dec;87(12):799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
3
The neurological examination of non-complicated preterm newborns using the Saint-Anne Dargassies Scale from birth to term.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010 Dec;68(6):893-7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2010000600012.
4
Interexaminer reliability of Amiel-Tison neurological assessments.阿米尔-蒂森神经评估的评估者间信度。
Pediatr Neurol. 2009 Nov;41(5):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.05.010.
5
Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study.神经发育障碍与孕33周前出生的5岁儿童的特殊护理(EPIPAGE研究):一项纵向队列研究
Lancet. 2008 Mar 8;371(9615):813-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60380-3.
6
Neurodevelopmental assessment in the first year with emphasis on evolution of tone.第一年的神经发育评估,重点关注肌张力的演变。
Indian Pediatr. 2006 Jun;43(6):527-34.
7
The influence of gestational age and birth weight in the clinical assessment of the muscle tone of healthy term and preterm newborns.胎龄和出生体重对健康足月儿和早产儿肌张力临床评估的影响。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2005 Dec;63(4):956-62. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2005000600010. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
8
[Mortality of very low birth weight preterm infants in Brazil: reality and challenges].[巴西极低出生体重早产儿的死亡率:现实与挑战]
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005 Mar;81(1 Suppl):S111-8. doi: 10.2223/1310.
9
Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth.极早早产儿六岁时的神经和发育障碍
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 6;352(1):9-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041367.
10
Interobserver reliability of the Amiel-Tison neurological assessment at term.
Pediatr Neurol. 2004 Mar;30(3):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2003.09.005.