Acosta Joie D, Chinman Matthew, Ebener Patricia, Phillips Andrea, Xenakis Lea, Malone Patrick S
RAND Corporation.
J Educ Psychol Consult. 2016;26(4):413-430. doi: 10.1080/10474412.2016.1217488. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Restorative Practices in schools lack rigorous evaluation studies. As an example of rigorous school-based research, this paper describes the first randomized control trial of restorative practices to date, the Study of Restorative Practices. It is a 5-year, cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Restorative Practices Intervention (RPI) in 14 middle schools in Maine to assess whether RPI impacts both positive developmental outcomes and problem behaviors and whether the effects persist during the transition from middle to high school. The two-year RPI intervention began in the 2014-2015 school year. The study's rationale and theoretical concerns are discussed along with methodological concerns including teacher professional development. The theoretical rationale and description of the methods from this study may be useful to others conducting rigorous research and evaluation in this area.
学校中的恢复性实践缺乏严格的评估研究。作为一项严格的基于学校的研究实例,本文描述了迄今为止恢复性实践的首个随机对照试验——恢复性实践研究。这是一项在缅因州14所中学进行的为期5年的恢复性实践干预(RPI)整群随机对照试验(RCT),旨在评估RPI是否会对积极的发展成果和问题行为产生影响,以及这些影响在从中等教育向高中教育过渡期间是否会持续存在。为期两年的RPI干预于2014 - 2015学年开始。本文讨论了该研究的理论依据和理论关注点,以及包括教师专业发展在内的方法学关注点。这项研究的理论依据和方法描述可能对该领域其他进行严格研究和评估的人有用。