Pham Martin H, Tuchman Alexander, Chen Thomas C, Acosta Frank L, Hsieh Patrick C, Liu John C
*Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine †USC Spine Center, Keck Hospital, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):360-366. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000312.
Retrospective review.
To review the feasibility of a posterior-only approach for instrumented reconstruction in lumbar burst fractures.
Burst fractures of the lumbar spine have been treated through a variety of techniques, including anterior, posterior, or combined approaches. Here we review series of patients undergoing posterior-only transpedicular corpectomy with instrumented fusion for traumatic lumbar burst fracture.
All patients treated at the Los Angeles County+University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center who had sustained traumatic lumbar burst fractures from February 2005 to February 2014 were reviewed.
A total of 178 traumatic lumbar burst fractures were identified of which 89 required operative intervention. Of those 89 operations, 7 patients underwent posterior-only approach for transpedicular corpectomy. Levels operated on were at L1 (4 patients), L2 (1 patient), and L4 (2 patients). The mean age was 35 years of age (range, 21-56 y), and mechanism of injury was either motor vehicle accident (5 patients) or fall (2 patients). Initial neurological examination was American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) B in 3 patients, ASIA D in 3 patients, and 1 patient was neurologically intact. Mean thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score on presentation was 6.4 (range, 5-8), whereas the mean load sharing classification score was 7.4 (range, 7-9). Of patients who were not immediately lost to follow-up on hospital discharge, mean clinical follow-up was 45.3 months (range, 18.8-68.6 mo), whereas mean radiographic follow-up was 28.8 months (range, 1.3-63.6 mo). At the last known radiographic follow-up, no patient had gross hardware fracture, pseudoarthrosis, or adjacent segment disease. One patient with the longest radiographic follow-up of 63.6 months was noted to have some minimal subsidence of his cage with no other change in his other hardware.
A posterior-only approach for transpedicular corpectomy and instrumented fusion is a viable treatment option for lumbar burst fracture which allows for reconstruction of the anterior column while avoiding many of the risks and complications associated with an anterior or combined approach.
回顾性研究。
评估单纯后路手术治疗腰椎爆裂骨折并进行器械重建的可行性。
腰椎爆裂骨折的治疗方法多种多样,包括前路、后路或联合入路。在此,我们回顾了一系列接受单纯后路经椎弓根椎体次全切除并器械融合治疗创伤性腰椎爆裂骨折的患者。
对2005年2月至2014年2月在洛杉矶县+南加州大学医学中心接受治疗的所有创伤性腰椎爆裂骨折患者进行回顾性研究。
共识别出178例创伤性腰椎爆裂骨折,其中89例需要手术干预。在这89例手术中,7例患者接受了单纯后路经椎弓根椎体次全切除手术。手术节段为L1(4例患者)、L2(1例患者)和L4(2例患者)。平均年龄为35岁(范围21 - 56岁),损伤机制为机动车事故(5例患者)或跌倒(2例患者)。初始神经学检查结果为:美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)B级3例患者,ASIA D级3例患者,1例患者神经功能完整。入院时胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分平均为6.4(范围5 - 8),而载荷分担分类评分平均为7.4(范围7 - 9)。出院后未立即失访的患者,平均临床随访时间为45.3个月(范围18.8 - 68.6个月),平均影像学随访时间为28.8个月(范围1.3 - 63.6个月)。在最后一次已知的影像学随访时,没有患者出现内固定物明显断裂、假关节形成或邻近节段病变。1例影像学随访时间最长达63.6个月的患者,其椎间融合器有一些轻微下沉,其他内固定物无其他变化。
单纯后路经椎弓根椎体次全切除并器械融合是治疗腰椎爆裂骨折的一种可行治疗选择,该方法可重建前柱,同时避免了许多与前路或联合入路相关的风险和并发症。