Department of Gerontology, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Department of Geriatric Healthcare Unit 5, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Sep 22;23:4549-4558. doi: 10.12659/msm.904254.
BACKGROUND This study analyzed the risk factors of cognitive impairment (CI) in elderly patients with chronic diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total of 385 elderly patients with chronic diseases were selected and assigned into CI and normal groups. The activities of daily living (ADL), global deterioration scale (GDS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA), and mini nutritional assessment (MNA) were performed to analyze the differences between the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for risk factors of CI in elderly patients with chronic diseases. RESULTS There were differences in age, education level, type 2 diabetes mellitus, multifocal cerebral infarction, hearing, and eyesight between CI and normal groups. Patients in the CI group showed more CD4+ cells, more admission times, and higher GDS scores than the normal group. Also, MMSE and MoCA scores revealed differences in total score, directive force, attention and calculating ability, language, delayed memory, reading comprehension, writing, and visual-spatial ability between the 2 groups. The number of B and CD8+ cells, ADL, and MNA scores were protective factors, while cerebral infarction history, number of CD4+ cells, admission times, GDS score, and age were risk factors of CI in elderly patients with chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides evidence that cerebral infarction history, number of CD4+ cells, admission times, GDS score, and age are risk factors of CI in elderly patients with chronic diseases.
背景 本研究分析了慢性病老年患者认知障碍(CI)的危险因素。
材料与方法 共选择 385 例慢性病老年患者,分为 CI 组和正常组。进行日常生活活动(ADL)、总体衰退量表(GDS)、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、患者生成的主观整体评估(PG-SGA)和微型营养评估(MNA),分析两组间差异。对慢性病老年患者 CI 的危险因素进行 logistic 回归分析。
结果 CI 组和正常组在年龄、教育程度、2 型糖尿病、多灶性脑梗死、听力和视力方面存在差异。CI 组患者 CD4+细胞较多,入院次数较多,GDS 评分较高。此外,MMSE 和 MoCA 评分在总分、定向力、注意力和计算能力、语言、延迟记忆、阅读理解、书写和视空间能力方面存在差异。B 细胞和 CD8+细胞、ADL 和 MNA 评分是保护因素,而脑梗死史、CD4+细胞数、入院次数、GDS 评分和年龄是慢性病老年患者 CI 的危险因素。
结论 本研究表明,脑梗死史、CD4+细胞数、入院次数、GDS 评分和年龄是慢性病老年患者 CI 的危险因素。