Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Massachusetts, USA.
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):702-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Despite caring for patients near the end-of-life (EOL), surgeons and anesthesiologists report low confidence in their ability to facilitate EOL conversations. This discrepancy exists despite competency requirements and professional medical society recommendations. The objective of this systematic review is to identify articles describing EOL communication training available to surgeons and anesthesiologists, and to assess their methodological rigor to inform future curricular design and evaluation.
This PRISMA-concordant systematic review identified English-language articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and manual review. Eligible articles included viewpoint pieces, and observational, qualitative, or case studies that featured an educational intervention for surgeons or anesthesiologists on EOL communication skills. Data on the study objective, setting, design, participants, intervention, and results were extracted and analyzed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodological quality.
Database and manual search returned 2710 articles. A total of 2268 studies were screened by title and abstract, 46 reviewed in full-text, and 16 included in the final analysis. Fifteen studies were conducted exclusively in academic hospitals. Two studies included attending surgeons as participants; all others featured residents, fellows, or a mix thereof. Fifteen studies used simulated role-playing to teach and assess EOL communication skills. Measured outcomes included knowledge, attitudes, confidence, self-rated or observer-rated communication skills, and curriculum feedback; significance of results varied widely. Most studies lacked adequate methodological quality and appropriate control groups to be confident about the significance and applicability of their results.
There are few quality studies evaluating EOL communication training for surgeons and anesthesiologists. These programs frequently use role-playing to teach and assess EOL communication skills. More studies are needed to evaluate the effect of these interventions on patient outcomes. However, evaluating the effectiveness of these initiatives poses methodological challenges.
尽管外科医生和麻醉师在照顾临终患者(EOL)方面经验丰富,但他们报告称,自己在促进 EOL 对话方面的能力信心不足。尽管有能力要求和专业医学协会的建议,但仍存在这种差异。本系统评价的目的是确定描述外科医生和麻醉师可获得的 EOL 沟通培训的文章,并评估其方法学严谨性,以为未来的课程设计和评估提供信息。
本 PRISMA 一致的系统评价从 PubMed、EMBASE 和手动审查中确定了英语文章。合格的文章包括观点文章,以及观察性、定性或案例研究,这些研究都针对外科医生或麻醉师进行了 EOL 沟通技巧的教育干预。提取并分析了研究目标、设置、设计、参与者、干预措施和结果的数据。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估方法学质量。
数据库和手动搜索共返回 2710 篇文章。共有 2268 篇研究通过标题和摘要进行了筛选,46 篇进行了全文审查,16 篇被纳入最终分析。15 项研究仅在学术医院进行。两项研究将主治外科医生作为参与者;其余所有研究均以住院医师、研究员或两者的混合为对象。15 项研究使用模拟角色扮演来教授和评估 EOL 沟通技巧。衡量的结果包括知识、态度、信心、自我评估或观察者评估的沟通技巧以及课程反馈;结果的意义差异很大。大多数研究方法质量不高,且缺乏适当的对照组,因此无法确定其结果的意义和适用性。
很少有质量研究评估外科医生和麻醉师的 EOL 沟通培训。这些计划经常使用角色扮演来教授和评估 EOL 沟通技巧。需要更多的研究来评估这些干预措施对患者结局的影响。然而,评估这些计划的有效性存在方法学上的挑战。