Suppr超能文献

帕金森病轻度认知障碍运动障碍学会工作组诊断标准评估。

An assessment of Movement Disorder Society Task Force diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.

机构信息

Behavioral Neurology and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2018 Jan;25(1):148-153. doi: 10.1111/ene.13467. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cognitive impairment is one of the most disabling non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Mild cognitive impairment constitutes a major risk for the development of Parkinson's disease dementia in the course of the disease. A Movement Disorder Society Task Force proposed diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD-MCI), comprising two operational levels: Level I and Level II. The objective of our study was to test the accuracy of Level I versus Level II diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

Eighty-six consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease were screened and 68 patients without dementia or depression were included in the study. We used the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Evaluation-R screening tools for Level I and an extensive neuropsychological battery for Level II assessment. We first diagnosed PD-MCI on the basis of Level II assessment and then calculated sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve, comparing the performance of the three screening batteries.

RESULTS

None of the three screening batteries proposed for Level I assessment provided satisfactory combined sensitivity and specificity for detecting PD-MCI, and their performance was similar. Using the Level II criteria, 29 patients (43%) were diagnosed as having PD-MCI. Lowest cut-off levels that provided at least 80% sensitivity were 24 for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, 29 for the Mini-Mental State Examination and 87 for the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Evaluation-R. However, specificity levels were below 80% at these cut-off levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that Level I assessment alone using screening batteries is not sufficiently sensitive/specific to detect PD-MCI.

摘要

背景与目的

认知障碍是帕金森病最常见的非运动症状之一。轻度认知障碍是帕金森病痴呆在疾病过程中发展的主要危险因素。运动障碍协会工作组提出了帕金森病轻度认知障碍(PD-MCI)的诊断标准,包括两个操作水平:I 级和 II 级。我们的研究目的是检验 I 级与 II 级诊断标准的准确性。

方法

连续筛选了 86 例帕金森病患者,纳入了 68 例无痴呆或抑郁的患者。我们使用蒙特利尔认知评估、简易精神状态检查和 Addenbrooke 认知评估-R 筛查工具进行 I 级评估,并用广泛的神经心理学电池进行 II 级评估。我们首先根据 II 级评估诊断 PD-MCI,然后计算三种筛查工具的敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积,比较它们的性能。

结果

三种用于 I 级评估的筛查工具均未提供令人满意的综合敏感性和特异性来检测 PD-MCI,其性能相似。使用 II 级标准,29 例(43%)患者被诊断为 PD-MCI。提供至少 80%敏感性的最低截断值分别为蒙特利尔认知评估 24 分、简易精神状态检查 29 分和 Addenbrooke 认知评估-R 87 分。然而,在这些截断值下,特异性水平低于 80%。

结论

我们得出结论,仅使用筛查工具进行 I 级评估不足以敏感/特异性地检测 PD-MCI。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验