Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1920 Coffey Road, Columbus 43214.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):9759-9768. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13035. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
Dairy cows in early lactation are often housed in a large group, where they may have to compete for access to feed and space. However, a cow's ability to compete may be impaired due to production disease, and housing in a small group with minimal competition may be beneficial for cow welfare. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of group size and health on social and feeding behavior of cows during the first 3 d after introduction to a new group. Data included 54 multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows that were moved from an individual maternity pen and individually joined an existing group pen for 6 (N6) or 24 cows (N24) on d 4 after calving. Cows were considered sick if they were diagnosed with and treated for milk fever, mastitis, or retained placenta, diagnosed with subclinical ketosis or metritis within 3 d of calving, or were diagnosed and treated for any other infection (n = 22; balanced across treatments). Stocking density of both pens was 100% at the feeding and lying areas. Behavioral data were collected from video recordings during the 1 d after introduction to the group pen, as well as via electronic feed bins and leg-attached accelerometers during the first 3 d after introduction to the group pen. No interactions between health status and group size were discovered. During the 1 d after introduction, N6 cows displaced other cows from feed less frequently than N24 cows (1.22 vs. 5.76 times/24 h), were less likely to access feed after a displacement (replacement; 0.29 vs. 1.67 times/24 h), and were less frequently being butted by another cow (0.42 vs. 1.69 times/24 h). Second-parity cows received more head butting than later-parity cows. Data obtained from feed bins showed that the number of replacements peaked on d 2 after introduction to the group pen. During the first 3 d we observed no effect of group size on DMI, but sick cows ate less than cows that were not sick (15.2 vs. 16.6 kg of DM/d). However, cows in N6 visited the feeder less often (42.4 vs. 55.6 times/d). Over the 3 d after introduction DMI and feeding time increased, whereas feeding rate decreased. Lying time and the number of lying bouts increased from d 1 to 2. The number of steps decreased over days, but the number of steps was higher among N24 than N6 cows on d 1 and d 2. Results suggest that cows experience less competition when moved to a smaller group after calving regardless of health status. Thus, minimizing competition by housing dairy cows in a small group for the first days after calving may improve cow welfare under commercial conditions.
奶牛在泌乳早期通常被饲养在一个大群体中,在这个大群体中,它们可能需要争夺饲料和空间。然而,由于生产疾病,奶牛的竞争能力可能会受到损害,而在一个小群体中饲养,竞争最小化可能对奶牛的福利有益。本研究的目的是调查群体大小和健康状况对奶牛在引入新群体后头 3 天的社会和采食行为的影响。数据包括 54 头经产荷斯坦-弗里森奶牛,它们在产后第 4 天从个体产房转移到现有的群体产房,每 6 头(N6)或 24 头(N24)。如果奶牛被诊断为并接受治疗乳热、乳腺炎或胎衣不下,如果在产后 3 天内被诊断为亚临床酮病或子宫内膜炎,或被诊断为并接受任何其他感染的治疗(n = 22;在治疗之间平衡),则认为奶牛生病了。两个畜栏的饲养密度在采食和躺卧区均为 100%。在引入群体畜栏后的 1 天内,通过视频记录收集行为数据,以及在引入群体畜栏后的头 3 天内,通过电子饲料箱和腿部附着的加速度计收集行为数据。未发现健康状况和群体大小之间存在相互作用。在引入后的 1 天内,N6 奶牛从饲料中驱赶其他奶牛的次数比 N24 奶牛少(1.22 次/24 h 比 5.76 次/24 h),在被驱赶后更不可能接触到饲料(替代物;0.29 次/24 h 比 1.67 次/24 h),被其他奶牛顶撞的次数也较少(0.42 次/24 h 比 1.69 次/24 h)。二胎奶牛比多胎奶牛受到更多的头部顶撞。从饲料箱中获得的数据表明,在引入群体畜栏后的第 2 天,替换次数达到峰值。在头 3 天内,我们没有发现群体大小对干物质采食量的影响,但患病奶牛的采食量低于未患病奶牛(15.2 比 16.6 公斤 DM/d)。然而,N6 奶牛去饲料槽的次数较少(42.4 比 55.6 次/d)。在引入后的 3 天内,干物质采食量和采食时间增加,而采食率下降。躺卧时间和躺卧次数从第 1 天到第 2 天增加。步数随着天数的减少而减少,但在第 1 天和第 2 天,N24 奶牛的步数高于 N6 奶牛。结果表明,无论健康状况如何,奶牛在产后被转移到较小的群体中时,竞争较少。因此,在商业条件下,通过在产后最初几天将奶牛饲养在小群体中,最小化竞争,可能会提高奶牛的福利。