Wang F X, Shao D F, Li S L, Wang Y J, Azarfar A, Cao Z J
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, PO Box 465, Khorramabad, Iran.
J Dairy Sci. 2016 May;99(5):3709-3717. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10098. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different stocking densities of 82 (0.82 cows per freestall and feed bin), 100, and 129% on behavior, productivity, and comfort indices of lactating Holstein dairy cows. Twenty-seven lactating cows (15 primiparous and 12 multiparous) were assigned to 1 of the 3 treatments, which were balanced for parity, milk yield, days in milk, and body weight in a 3×3 Latin square design with 14-d periods. After 7 d of adaptation to the treatments, lying time and bouts were recorded at 1-min intervals for 3 d, DMI and feeding time were monitored electronically by feed bins, and rumination time was quantified at 2-h periods for 5 d during each period. The cow comfort index, stall standing index, stall perching index, and stall use index (SUI) were calculated using 10-min scan samples of video recording from d 8 to 10 of each period. Milk yield was recorded from d 8 to 12 and milk composition was determined from composite samples on d 12 in each period. Daily lying time, lying bouts, and bout duration did not differ among the stocking densities. The ratio of lying time ≥12 h/d (the number of cows with daily lying time ≥12 h/d divided by number of cows per pen) was higher for cows housed at 82% stocking density compared with those housed at 100% stocking density, with stocking density of 129% intermediate. Hourly lying time was lower at 100% stocking density compared with 82 and 129% stocking densities during the peak period (2300-0400 h), determined based on diurnal pattern of lying time. Daily dry matter intake, feeding time, and feeding rate were not affected by stocking density. After morning milking, dry matter intake and feeding time was reduced at 129 versus 82% stocking density during peak feeding time (0600-0800 h), determined based on diurnal patterns of feeding behavior. Stocking density had no effect on rumination time, milk yield and milk composition. The ratio of SUI ≥85% (mean of the number of SUI ≥85% divided by the number of SUI at 10-min scan samples during a 24-h period) was lower at 129 versus 82% stocking density, with stocking density of 100% intermediate. During peak lying time after evening milking (2300-0400 h), both cow comfort index and SUI were higher at 129 than at 100% stocking density. The SUI was lower 2h after morning milking (0800-0900 h) for cows housed at 129% compared with those housed at 82 and 100% stocking densities. In conclusion, when compared with 100% stocking density, understocking contributed to natural behaviors of cows that including lying, feeding, and rumination behavior, whereas overstocking did not cause negative effect on behavior, productivity, and comfort indices of cows in this study.
本研究的目的是调查82%(每个自由牛栏和饲料槽0.82头奶牛)、100%和129%的不同饲养密度对泌乳期荷斯坦奶牛行为、生产性能和舒适度指标的影响。27头泌乳奶牛(15头初产牛和12头经产牛)被分配到3种处理中的1种,在3×3拉丁方设计中,按胎次、产奶量、泌乳天数和体重进行平衡,每个周期为14天。在适应处理7天后,以1分钟的间隔记录躺卧时间和次数,持续3天,通过饲料槽电子监测干物质采食量(DMI)和采食时间,在每个周期的5天内,每2小时对反刍时间进行量化。使用每个周期第8至10天10分钟的视频扫描样本计算奶牛舒适度指数、牛栏站立指数、牛栏栖息指数和牛栏使用指数(SUI)。在每个周期的第8至12天记录产奶量,并在第12天从混合样本中测定牛奶成分。不同饲养密度下,每日躺卧时间、躺卧次数和躺卧时长没有差异。与饲养密度为100%的奶牛相比,饲养密度为82%的奶牛中躺卧时间≥12小时/天的比例更高(每天躺卧时间≥12小时/天的奶牛数量除以每栏奶牛数量),饲养密度为129%的处于中间水平。根据躺卧时间的昼夜模式确定,在高峰期(23:00 - 04:00时),饲养密度为100%时的每小时躺卧时间低于82%和129%的饲养密度。饲养密度对干物质采食量、采食时间和采食速率没有影响。根据采食行为的昼夜模式确定,在早晨挤奶后,饲养密度为129%时的干物质采食量和采食时间在采食高峰期(06:00 - 08:00时)低于82%的饲养密度。饲养密度对反刍时间、产奶量和牛奶成分没有影响。饲养密度为129%时,SUI≥85%的比例(24小时内10分钟扫描样本中SUI≥85%的平均值除以SUI数量)低于82%的饲养密度,饲养密度为100%的处于中间水平。在晚上挤奶后的躺卧高峰期(23:00 - 04:00时),饲养密度为129%时的奶牛舒适度指数和SUI均高于100%的饲养密度。与饲养密度为82%和100%的奶牛相比,饲养密度为129%的奶牛在早晨挤奶后2小时(08:00 - 09:00时)的SUI较低。总之,与100%的饲养密度相比,饲养密度过低有助于奶牛的自然行为,包括躺卧、采食和反刍行为,而在本研究中,饲养密度过高对奶牛的行为、生产性能和舒适度指标没有产生负面影响。