Dhouib Amira, Tabard-Fougere Anne, Hanquinet Sylviane, Dayer Romain
Pediatric Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Service of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, 6 Rue Willy Donzé, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J. 2018 May;27(5):1058-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5305-2. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
The accurate diagnosis of spondylolysis is widely made with CT scan considered as the gold standard. However, CT represents significant radiation exposure particularly substantial in a young and sometimes still growing population. Although the role of MRI in identifying edema/inflammation within the pars as an active lesion is proved, its ability to demonstrate and classify pars fracture line as same as CT is still controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to determine sensitivity and specificity of MRI in the direct visualisation of the pars defect.
The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies from the earliest researchable time to December 2016 for cases in which the accuracy of MRI was reported for the diagnosis of spondylolysis in young patients. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality for each selected study using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 tool. A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of pooled data of selected studies was performed by a systematic review. For each selected study, sensitivity and specificity was recalculated, by considering only direct visualisation of a fracture line of the pars. The hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to estimate the diagnostic performance of MR imaging. Heterogeneity was also tested.
The systematic review identified 4 out of a total of 1300 studies to be included in the meta-analysis. On a per-pars basis (a total of 1122 pars), the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the MRI for the direct diagnosis of a pars defect were 81% (95% CI 54-94%) and 99% (95% CI 98-100%), respectively. A high overall heterogeneity (I2 = 79.5%) was computed with respective high and low heterogeneity on sensitivity (I2 = 87.9%) and specificity (I2 = 38.4%).
This meta-analysis demonstrated a high diagnostic performance of MR imaging for the diagnosis of a pars defect in young adults. This technique may be considered as a first-line imaging technique as it helps to avoid exposure to ionising radiation.
椎弓根峡部裂的准确诊断广泛采用CT扫描,其被视为金标准。然而,CT会带来显著的辐射暴露,对于年轻且有时仍在生长发育的人群而言尤其量大。尽管MRI在识别椎弓根内水肿/炎症作为活动性病变方面的作用已得到证实,但其显示和分类椎弓根骨折线的能力与CT相同这一点仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在确定MRI在直接显示椎弓根缺损方面的敏感性和特异性。
系统检索PubMed和Embase数据库,从最早可检索到的时间至2016年12月,查找报告了MRI诊断年轻患者椎弓根峡部裂准确性的相关研究。两名研究者使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2工具独立评估每项入选研究的方法学质量。通过系统评价对入选研究的汇总数据报告的敏感性和特异性进行荟萃分析。对于每项入选研究,仅考虑椎弓根骨折线的直接显示情况,重新计算敏感性和特异性。生成层次汇总接受者操作特征曲线以评估MRI的诊断性能。还对异质性进行了检验。
系统评价在总共1300项研究中确定了4项纳入荟萃分析。以每个椎弓根为基础(共1122个椎弓根),MRI直接诊断椎弓根缺损的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为81%(95%CI 54 - 94%)和99%(95%CI 98 - 100%)。计算得出总体异质性较高(I² = 79.5%),敏感性(I² = 87.9%)和特异性(I² = 38.4%)分别存在高异质性和低异质性。
本荟萃分析表明,MRI对年轻成年人椎弓根缺损的诊断具有较高的诊断性能。由于该技术有助于避免电离辐射暴露,可被视为一线成像技术。