• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小切口外翻颈动脉内膜切除术联合颈内动脉非接触式隔离技术的结果。

Outcomes of mini-incision eversion carotid endarterectomy combined with nontouch isolation technique of the internal carotid artery.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):490-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.104. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.104
PMID:28943006
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We developed a mini-incision eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedure (the Jikei method CEA) to prevent perioperative embolic stroke. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze perioperative and midterm outcomes after the Jikei method CEA.

METHODS

We evaluated patients with the Jikei method CEA at our institution between January 2006 and June 2014. The primary end point was a major adverse event, which included death, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and myocardial infarction, within 30 days of CEA. Secondary end points were postoperative ipsilateral stroke and restenosis.

RESULTS

We retrospectively studied 120 lesions in 110 patients. The mean age was 72.2 ± 8.0 years. With regard to the 120 lesions, 56 lesions (46.7%) were symptomatic and 73 lesions (60.8%) showed ≥90% severe stenosis. The mean length of the skin incision was 3.2 ± 0.5 cm. The mean operative time, volume of blood loss, and internal carotid artery clamp time were 171.0 ± 50.7 minutes, 161.6 ± 110.8 mL, and 35.7 ± 10.8 minutes, respectively. There were three perioperative major adverse events (2.5%), including two strokes (1.7%) and one intracranial hemorrhage (0.8%) resulting from hyperperfusion syndrome. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (range, 2-303 days). The mean follow-up was 3.9 ± 2.2 years. There was no case of ipsilateral stroke during the follow-up period. The freedom from ipsilateral stroke at 5 years was 98.3%. Three lesions (2.5%) developed restenosis. The freedom from restenosis was 97.2% at 5 years. The freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 99.0% because carotid artery stent placement was necessary in one patient with severe restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The Jikei method CEA was safe and effective in preventing perioperative and midterm stroke.

摘要

目的

我们开发了一种微创外翻颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)(Jikei 方法 CEA),以预防围手术期栓塞性卒中。本研究旨在回顾性分析 Jikei 方法 CEA 的围手术期和中期结果。

方法

我们评估了 2006 年 1 月至 2014 年 6 月期间在我院接受 Jikei 方法 CEA 的患者。主要终点是 CEA 后 30 天内的主要不良事件,包括死亡、卒中和颅内出血、心肌梗死。次要终点是术后同侧卒中和再狭窄。

结果

我们回顾性研究了 110 例患者的 120 处病变。平均年龄为 72.2±8.0 岁。在 120 处病变中,56 处病变(46.7%)为症状性病变,73 处病变(60.8%)显示≥90%严重狭窄。皮肤切口的平均长度为 3.2±0.5cm。平均手术时间、失血量和颈内动脉夹闭时间分别为 171.0±50.7 分钟、161.6±110.8mL 和 35.7±10.8 分钟。有 3 例围手术期主要不良事件(2.5%),包括 2 例卒中(1.7%)和 1 例颅内出血(0.8%),由高灌注综合征引起。中位术后住院时间为 6 天(范围:2-303 天)。平均随访时间为 3.9±2.2 年。随访期间无同侧卒中发生。5 年同侧卒中无复发率为 98.3%。3 处病变(2.5%)发生再狭窄。5 年无再狭窄率为 97.2%。5 年再干预无复发率为 99.0%,因为 1 例严重再狭窄患者需要颈动脉支架置入。

结论

Jikei 方法 CEA 安全有效,可预防围手术期和中期卒中。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of mini-incision eversion carotid endarterectomy combined with nontouch isolation technique of the internal carotid artery.小切口外翻颈动脉内膜切除术联合颈内动脉非接触式隔离技术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):490-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.104. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
Selective external endarterectomy in patients with ipsilateral symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion.同侧症状性颈内动脉闭塞患者的选择性颈动脉内膜切除术。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):145-51.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.059. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
3
Retrograde stenting of proximal lesions with carotid endarterectomy increases risk.颈动脉内膜切除术对近端病变进行逆行支架置入会增加风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jun;63(6):1517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.028. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
4
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
5
Carotid artery stenting outcomes are equivalent to carotid endarterectomy outcomes for patients with post-carotid endarterectomy stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术的结果与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄患者的结果相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.074. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
6
Clinical and anatomic outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术的临床和解剖学结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):944-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.059.
7
Risk and outcome profile of carotid endarterectomy with proximal intervention is concerning in multi-institutional assessment.多机构评估中,颈动脉内膜切除术伴近端干预的风险和结果特征令人担忧。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):760-769. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.069. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
Primary closure after carotid endarterectomy is not inferior to other closure techniques.颈动脉内膜切除术后的一期缝合并不逊于其他缝合技术。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):678-683.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.415. Epub 2016 May 14.
9
Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy.外翻颈动脉内膜切除术的耐久性。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.088. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
10
Concomitant ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy and stenting is an effective treatment for tandem carotid artery lesions.同期同侧颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术是治疗串联性颈动脉病变的有效方法。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1579-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.054. Epub 2019 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
An autopsy case of retrograde in situ branched stent grafting for a complex aortic arch aneurysm.一例复杂主动脉弓动脉瘤逆行原位分支支架移植物植入术的尸检病例
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2022 May 12;8(3):313-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.04.007. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Endovascular treatment with an iliac branch endoprosthesis for a right subclavian artery aneurysm.采用髂支血管内支架修复术治疗右锁骨下动脉瘤。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2020 Dec 28;8(1):35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.12.008. eCollection 2022 Mar.