University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Pharmacy, Knoxville, TN, USA; University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2017 Nov;74:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
Peri/post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (POABP) has become standard practice for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in head and neck cancer patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction, but few data exist on optimal POABP regimens. Current surgical prophylaxis guideline recommendations fail to account for the complexity of microvascular reconstruction relative to other head and neck procedures, specifically regarding wound classification and antibiotic duration. Selection of POABP spectrum is also controversial, and must balance the choice between too narrow, risking subsequent infection, or too broad, and possible unwanted effects (e.g. antibiotic resistance, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea). POABP regimens should retain activity against bacteria expected to colonize the upper respiratory/salivary tracts, which include Gram-positive organisms and facultative anaerobes. However, Gram-negative bacilli also contribute to SSI in this setting. POABP doses should be optimized in order to achieve therapeutic tissue concentrations at the surgical site. Antibiotics targeted towards methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa are not warranted for all patients. Prolonged POABP durations have shown no differences in SSI when compared to short POABP durations, but prolonged durations provide unnecessarily antibiotic exposure and risk for adverse effects. Given the lack of standardization behind antibiotic POABP in this setting and the potential for poor patient outcomes, this practice necessitates an additional focus of surgeons and antimicrobial stewardship programs. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of POABP evidence and discuss pertinent clinical implications of appropriate use.
围手术期/术后抗生素预防(POABP)已成为预防头颈部癌症患者接受微血管重建后手术部位感染(SSI)的标准做法,但关于最佳 POABP 方案的数据很少。当前的手术预防指南建议没有考虑到微血管重建相对于其他头颈部手术的复杂性,特别是关于伤口分类和抗生素持续时间。POABP 谱的选择也存在争议,必须在风险太小而导致后续感染的风险与风险太大而可能产生不良影响(例如抗生素耐药性、艰难梭菌相关性腹泻)之间取得平衡。POABP 方案应保留对预期定植在上呼吸道/唾液中的细菌的活性,包括革兰氏阳性菌和兼性厌氧菌。然而,革兰氏阴性杆菌在这种情况下也会导致 SSI。为了在手术部位达到治疗性组织浓度,应优化 POABP 剂量。并非所有患者都需要针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌或铜绿假单胞菌的抗生素。与短 POABP 持续时间相比,延长 POABP 持续时间并不能降低 SSI 的发生率,但延长持续时间会不必要地增加抗生素暴露和不良反应的风险。鉴于在这种情况下抗生素 POABP 缺乏标准化以及患者预后不佳的可能性,这种做法需要外科医生和抗菌药物管理计划的额外关注。本综述的目的是提供 POABP 证据概述,并讨论适当使用的相关临床意义。