Department of Exercise Science, Program of Physical Therapy, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
J Hand Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;31(4):554-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
Clinical measurement.
Individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) sometimes exhibit weakness of palmar abduction strength (TAS). Reliable assessment of this strength in both subjects with and without CTS with the commonly available Microfet 2 is not known.
The purpose of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliabilities of a handheld dynamometric (HHD) method to assess TAS in individuals with and without CTS using the commercially available MicroFET2 and to examine the association between TAS in individuals with CTS and the Carpal Tunnel Symptom Questionnaire (CTSQ) scores.
In 2 different study phases, individuals with and without CTS were assessed for TAS by 2 different examiners. The CTSQ was administered to the individuals with CTS.
Intrarater and interrater reliability coefficients (0.89-0.93 and 0.82-0.90, respectively) were excellent in individuals with and without CTS. Weak negative correlations were found between TAS and overall CTSQ and symptom severity subscale scores, and a moderate negative correlation was found between TAS and functional Status Subscale score.
This HHD method of reliably assessing TAS better quantifies deficits and progress than traditional manual muscle testing for muscle grades greater than 3/5.
This method of HHD reliably quantifies TAS but is more reliable with the same than different raters.
临床测量。
患有腕管综合征(CTS)的个体有时会表现出手掌外展力量(TAS)减弱。使用常见的 Microfet 2 对 CTS 患者和非 CTS 患者进行这种力量的可靠评估尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是确定手持式测力计(HHD)方法评估 CTS 患者和非 CTS 患者 TAS 的内部和外部测试者可靠性,使用市售的 MicroFET2,并检查 CTS 患者 TAS 与腕管症状问卷(CTSQ)评分之间的关联。
在 2 个不同的研究阶段,使用 2 个不同的检查者评估 CTS 患者和非 CTS 患者的 TAS。CTSQ 分发给 CTS 患者。
在 CTS 患者和非 CTS 患者中,内部和外部测试者可靠性系数(分别为 0.89-0.93 和 0.82-0.90)均为优秀。TAS 与 CTSQ 的总体评分和症状严重程度子量表评分之间呈弱负相关,与功能状态子量表评分之间呈中度负相关。
与传统的手动肌肉测试相比,这种可靠评估 TAS 的 HHD 方法可以更好地量化缺陷和进展,适用于肌肉等级大于 3/5 的情况。
这种 HHD 方法可靠地量化 TAS,但同一测试者比不同测试者更可靠。