Heron-Delaney Michelle, Damon Fabrice, Quinn Paul C, Méary David, Xiao Naiqi G, Lee Kang, Pascalis Olivier
School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, 4075, Australia.
Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LPNC UMR 5105, F-38040 Grenoble, France.
Int J Behav Dev. 2017 Sep;41(5):581-587. doi: 10.1177/0165025416651735. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
The visual preferences of infants for adult versus infant faces were investigated. Caucasian 3.5- and 6-month-olds were presented with Caucasian adult versus infant face pairs and Asian adult versus infant face pairs, in both upright and inverted orientations. Both age groups showed a visual preference for upright adult over infant faces when the faces were Caucasian, but not when they were Asian. The preference is unlikely to have arisen because of low-level perceptual features because: (1) no preference was observed for the inverted stimuli, (2) no differences were observed in adult similarity ratings of the upright infant-adult face pairs from the two races, and (3) no differences between the infant and adult faces were observed across races in an image-based analysis of salience. The findings are discussed in terms of the social attributes of faces that are learned from experience and what this implies for developmental accounts of a recognition advantage for adult faces in particular and models of face processing more generally.
研究了婴儿对成人面孔与婴儿面孔的视觉偏好。向3.5个月和6个月大的高加索婴儿呈现高加索成人与婴儿面孔对以及亚洲成人与婴儿面孔对,面孔呈现方向有正立和倒置两种。当面孔为高加索人时,两个年龄组的婴儿都表现出对正立成人面孔而非婴儿面孔的视觉偏好,但当面孔为亚洲人时则没有这种偏好。这种偏好不太可能是由于低层次的感知特征引起的,原因如下:(1)对倒置刺激未观察到偏好;(2)在两个种族的正立婴儿-成人面孔对的成人相似度评级中未观察到差异;(3)在基于图像显著性的分析中,不同种族的婴儿面孔和成人面孔之间未观察到差异。研究结果从从经验中学习到的面孔社会属性方面进行了讨论,以及这对特别是成人面孔识别优势的发展解释和更一般的面孔加工模型意味着什么。