Dong Si-Yang, Zeng Rui-Chao, Jin Lang-Ping, Yang Fan, Zhang Xiang-Jian, Yao Zhi-Han, Zhang Xiao-Hua, Wang Ou-Chen
Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, P.R. China.
Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2017 Oct;14(4):4122-4134. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6694. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
The association between central lymph node metastasis (LNM) and risk factors, including the presence of the BRAF mutation, BRAF, in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) requires further investigation. A potent risk factor that can indicate LNM in different histological subtypes of PTC and in different preoperative central lymph node statuses also requires further research. A total of 287 patients with PTC who accepted thyroidectomy were included in the present study. Clinicopathological data of these patients were reviewed to examine the risk factors for central LNM through univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall, BRAF in patients with cN0 (subclinical nodal disease) and cN1 (other than cN0) PTC was associated with central LNM. However, multivariate analyses demonstrated that BRAF was not an independent risk factor in patients with cN1 or cN0 PTC. For patients with classical variant PTC (CVPTC), BRAF was independently associated with central LNM. However, on further analysis, the association was only significant in patients with cN0 CVPTC. For patients with follicular variant PTC (FVPTC) or aggressive variant PTC (AVPTC), the BRAF mutation rate was not significantly different between patients with and without central LNM. In conclusion, BRAF was an independent risk factor for central LNM overall in patients with PTC and in patients with CVPTC, particularly in patients with cN0 CVPTC. However, BRAF was not an independent risk factor for patients with FVPTC and AVPTC. Therefore, BRAF provides varied clinical significance in different histological subtypes and preoperative central lymph node status.
甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者中央淋巴结转移(LNM)与包括BRAF突变在内的风险因素之间的关联尚需进一步研究。一种能够在PTC不同组织学亚型以及不同术前中央淋巴结状态下提示LNM的有效风险因素也有待进一步探索。本研究共纳入287例行甲状腺切除术的PTC患者。回顾这些患者的临床病理资料,通过单因素和多因素分析来研究中央LNM的风险因素。总体而言,cN0(亚临床淋巴结疾病)和cN1(非cN0)PTC患者的BRAF与中央LNM相关。然而,多因素分析表明,BRAF在cN1或cN0 PTC患者中并非独立风险因素。对于经典型PTC(CVPTC)患者,BRAF与中央LNM独立相关。然而,进一步分析显示,这种关联仅在cN0 CVPTC患者中具有统计学意义。对于滤泡型PTC(FVPTC)或侵袭型PTC(AVPTC)患者,有无中央LNM患者之间的BRAF突变率无显著差异。总之,BRAF是PTC患者及CVPTC患者总体中央LNM的独立风险因素,尤其是cN0 CVPTC患者。然而,BRAF并非FVPTC和AVPTC患者的独立风险因素。因此,BRAF在不同组织学亚型和术前中央淋巴结状态中具有不同的临床意义。