Hammond Drayton A, Killingsworth Catherine A, Painter Jacob T, Pennick Rose E, Chatterjee Kshitij, Boye Bradley, Meena Nikhil
Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Pharmacy. Little Rock, AR (United States).
Department of Pharmacy, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare. Memphis, TN (United States).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):948. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.948. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
Acid suppression therapy (AST) is routinely used in critically ill patients to prevent stress-related mucosal bleeding (SRMB).
Our objective was to determine the impact of a structured educational intervention on AST used for prevention of SRMB on appropriateness of AST.
A single-center, retrospective, cohort study of appropriate use of AST in critically ill patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic medical center between January to June of 2014 (no intervention) and January to June of 2015 (intervention) was conducted. The percentage of patients prescribed inappropriate AST, inappropriate AST at ICU transfer and hospital discharge, doses of inappropriate AST, and adverse effects associated with AST use were compared between periods using chi-square tests.
Patients in the intervention group (n=118) were 5 years older than patients in the no intervention group (n=101). AST was inappropriately initiated more frequently in the no intervention group (23% vs. 11%, p=0.012). Continuation of inappropriate AST at ICU transfer and hospital discharge was similar between groups (60% vs. 53%, p=0.277 and 18% vs. 14%, p=0.368, respectively).
Patients had appropriate AST initiated and inappropriate AST withheld more frequently when formal education was provided. This low-cost intervention strategy can be implemented easily at institutions where pharmacists interact with physicians on rounding services and should be evaluated in institutions where interactions between pharmacists and physicians occur more frequently in non-rounding situations.
酸抑制疗法(AST)常用于重症患者,以预防应激性黏膜出血(SRMB)。
我们的目的是确定一项结构化教育干预措施对用于预防SRMB的AST在适宜性方面的影响。
对一所学术医疗中心内科重症监护病房(ICU)在2014年1月至6月(无干预)和2015年1月至6月(干预)期间收治的重症患者使用AST的适宜性进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究。使用卡方检验比较不同时期开具不适当AST的患者百分比、ICU转科和出院时不适当AST情况、不适当AST的剂量以及与AST使用相关的不良反应。
干预组患者(n = 118)比无干预组患者(n = 101)年长5岁。无干预组更频繁地不恰当地开始使用AST(23%对11%,p = 0.012)。两组在ICU转科和出院时继续使用不适当AST的情况相似(分别为60%对53%,p = 0.277和18%对14%,p = 0.368)。
当提供正规教育时,患者更频繁地开始适当使用AST并停止不适当使用AST。这种低成本干预策略可以在药剂师与医生在查房服务中互动的机构轻松实施,并且应该在药剂师和医生在非查房情况下更频繁互动的机构进行评估。