• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项减少非重症监护病房患者不适当使用抑酸疗法的协作策略的影响

Impact of A Collaborative Strategy to Reduce the Inappropriate Use of Acid Suppressive Therapy in Non-Intensive Care Unit Patients.

作者信息

Belfield Kristen D, Kuyumjian Arpi G, Teran Rafael, Amadi Mariette, Blatt Melissa, Bicking Keri

机构信息

1 Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.

2 Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Jul;51(7):577-583. doi: 10.1177/1060028017698797. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1177/1060028017698797
PMID:28622739
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is inappropriately prescribed in more than 30% of non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients, leading to unnecessary adverse events as well as increases in economic burden.

OBJECTIVE

There was an increasing trend in the prophylactic use of acid suppressive therapy (AST) in non-critically ill patients at our institution, which prompted this initiative aimed at reducing the inappropriate use of AST in non-ICU patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective interventional study that consisted of formulation of a guideline, education to the hospitalist service, and intervention by clinical pharmacists. All adult non-ICU patients admitted to the hospitalist service who were newly initiated on AST were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was a comparison of the proportion of inpatient days with inappropriate AST. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of patients discharged on inappropriate AST and drug acquisition costs, successful pharmacy interventions, hospitalist interventions, incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and drug costs averted through pharmacy intervention.

RESULTS

There were 61 patients in the historical group and 81 patients in the interventional group. This intervention resulted in a 31% absolute reduction in inappropriate patient days of AST and a 24% absolute reduction in patients discharged on inappropriate AST. There were 23 successful interventions. There were no cases of CDI and 1 GI bleed. This intervention resulted in an 87% reduction in drug acquisition costs per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

A collaboration between clinical pharmacists and a hospitalist service can significantly reduce the inappropriate use of AST in non-ICU patients.

摘要

背景

超过30%的非重症监护病房(ICU)患者接受了不恰当的应激性溃疡预防治疗(SUP),导致了不必要的不良事件以及经济负担增加。

目的

在我们机构,非危重症患者预防性使用抑酸治疗(AST)的趋势呈上升态势,这促使我们开展此项旨在减少非ICU患者AST不当使用的举措。

方法

这是一项回顾性干预研究,包括制定指南、对住院医师团队进行教育以及临床药师进行干预。所有新开始接受AST治疗的入住住院医师团队服务的成年非ICU患者均纳入研究。主要结局是比较接受不当AST治疗的住院天数比例。次要结局包括比较因不当AST治疗出院的患者、药品采购成本、成功的药学干预、住院医师干预、艰难梭菌感染(CDI)或胃肠道(GI)出血的发生率,以及通过药学干预避免的药品成本。

结果

历史组有61例患者,干预组有81例患者。此项干预使AST不当使用的患者天数绝对减少了31%,因不当AST治疗出院的患者绝对减少了24%。有23次成功干预。无CDI病例,有1例GI出血。此项干预使每位患者的药品采购成本降低了87%。

结论

临床药师与住院医师团队之间的合作可显著减少非ICU患者AST的不当使用。

相似文献

1
Impact of A Collaborative Strategy to Reduce the Inappropriate Use of Acid Suppressive Therapy in Non-Intensive Care Unit Patients.一项减少非重症监护病房患者不适当使用抑酸疗法的协作策略的影响
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Jul;51(7):577-583. doi: 10.1177/1060028017698797. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
An interprofessional approach to reducing the overutilization of stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult medical and surgical intensive care units.一种跨专业方法,用于减少成人内科和外科重症监护病房应激性溃疡预防措施的过度使用。
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Apr;48(4):462-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028013517088. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
3
Acid Suppressive Therapy for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Noncritically Ill Patients.非危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的抑酸治疗
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Sep;49(9):1004-8. doi: 10.1177/1060028015592014. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
4
Frequency of inappropriate continuation of acid suppressive therapy after discharge in patients who began therapy in the surgical intensive care unit.在外科重症监护病房开始接受治疗的患者出院后不适当继续进行抑酸治疗的频率。
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Aug;28(8):968-76. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.8.968.
5
Stress ulcer prophylaxis: reducing non-indicated prescribing after hospital discharge.应激性溃疡预防:减少出院后的非指征性处方。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Oct;44(10):1565-71. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P167. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
6
Effects of pharmacy resident led education on resident physician prescribing habits associated with stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-intensive care unit patients.药学住院医师主导的教育对非重症监护病房患者应激性溃疡预防相关住院医师处方习惯的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Jun 1;72(11 Suppl 1):S48-52. doi: 10.2146/sp150013.
7
Impact of clinical pharmacy services on stress ulcer prophylaxis prescribing and related cost in patients with renal insufficiency.临床药学服务对肾功能不全患者应激性溃疡预防用药及相关费用的影响。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Aug;21(4):263-9. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12005. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
8
Overuse of Acid-Suppression Therapy at an Urban Tertiary Hospital.一家城市三级医院的抑酸治疗过度使用情况。
South Med J. 2015 Dec;108(12):732-8. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000383.
9
Impact of a clinical pharmacist stress ulcer prophylaxis management program on inappropriate use in hospitalized patients.临床药师应激性溃疡预防管理方案对住院患者不适当使用的影响。
Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):905-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
10
Descriptive analysis of a clinical pharmacy intervention to improve the appropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in a hospital infectious disease ward.一项关于临床药学干预措施的描述性分析,该干预旨在改善某医院传染病病房应激性溃疡预防用药的合理使用情况。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Mar;16(2):114-21. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.2.114.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of Guideline-Based Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors for Perioperative Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis: A Pre-Post Study Guided by CFIR-ERIC.基于指南使用质子泵抑制剂进行围手术期应激性溃疡预防的实施:一项由CFIR-ERIC指导的前后对照研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Mar 18;19:635-645. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S496310. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of pharmacy-supported interventions on proportion of patients receiving non-indicated acid suppressive therapy upon discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药学支持干预对出院时接受非指征性抑酸治疗患者比例的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243134. eCollection 2020.
3
L. extracts as pharmanutrient for stress-related mucosal disease in rat stomach.
L提取物作为大鼠胃中与应激相关的黏膜疾病的药物营养剂。
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2020 Jul;67(1):89-101. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.20-11. Epub 2020 Jun 11.