Collett Rachael A, Fisher Diana O
School of Biological Sciences The University of Queensland St Lucia QLD Australia.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug 14;7(18):7527-7533. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3275. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Pitfall trapping is the standard technique to estimate activity and relative abundance of leaf litter arthropods. Pitfall trapping is not ideal for long-term sampling because it is lethal, labor-intensive, and may have taxonomic sampling biases. We test an alternative sampling method that can be left in place for several months at a time: verticallyplaced time-lapse camera traps that have a short focal distance, enabling identification of small arthropods. We tested the effectiveness of these time-lapse cameras, and quantified escape and avoidance behavior of arthropod orders encountering pitfall traps by placing cameras programed with a range of sampling intervals above pitfalls, to assess numerical, taxonomic, and body size differences in samples collected by the two methods. Cameras programed with 1- or 15-min intervals recorded around twice as many arthropod taxa per day and a third more individuals per day than pitfall traps. Hymenoptera (ants), Embioptera (webspinners), and Blattodea (cockroaches) frequently escaped from pitfalls so were particularly under-sampled by them. The time-lapse camera method effectively samples litter arthropods to collect long-term data. It is standardized, non-lethal, and does not alter the substrate or require frequent visits.
陷阱诱捕是估算落叶层节肢动物活动和相对丰度的标准技术。陷阱诱捕对于长期采样并不理想,因为它具有致命性、劳动强度大,并且可能存在分类学采样偏差。我们测试了一种可以一次放置数月的替代采样方法:垂直放置的延时相机陷阱,其焦距短,能够识别小型节肢动物。我们测试了这些延时相机的有效性,并通过在陷阱上方放置设置了一系列采样间隔的相机,量化了遇到陷阱诱捕的节肢动物目的逃逸和回避行为,以评估两种方法采集的样本在数量、分类学和体型上的差异。设置为1分钟或15分钟间隔的相机每天记录的节肢动物分类单元数量约为陷阱诱捕的两倍,每天记录的个体数量比陷阱诱捕多三分之一。膜翅目(蚂蚁)、纺足目(足丝蚁)和蜚蠊目(蟑螂)经常从陷阱中逃脱,因此它们在陷阱诱捕中的采样尤其不足。延时相机方法有效地对落叶层节肢动物进行采样以收集长期数据。它是标准化的、非致命的,不会改变基质,也不需要频繁访问。