• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预混胰岛素与基础-餐时胰岛素方案治疗 2 型糖尿病的临床结局比较:随机对照试验与真实世界数据比较。

Premixed vs basal-bolus insulin regimen in Type 2 diabetes: comparison of clinical outcomes from randomized controlled trials and real-world data.

机构信息

Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2017 Dec;34(12):1728-1736. doi: 10.1111/dme.13518. Epub 2017 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1111/dme.13518
PMID:28945928
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the concordance between data derived from randomized controlled trial (RCT) and real-world estimates of HbA and weight change after 24 weeks of initiation of a basal-bolus compared with a premixed insulin regimen in people with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Data eight RCTs were pooled after a systematic review of studies examining basal-bolus (n = 1893) or premixed (n = 1517) regimens. Real-world data were extracted from the UK primary care dataset for people on basal-bolus (n = 7483) or premixed insulin regimens (n=10 744). The mean differences between HbA and weight from baseline were calculated using t-tests, while analysis of variance was used to compare the two treatment regimens. Linear regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of this change.

RESULTS

Both insulin regimens were associated with HbA reductions (real-world data -0.28%; RCT data, -1.4%) and weight gain (real-world data, +0.27 kg; RCT data, +2.96 kg) but there were no significant differences between basal-bolus and premixed insulin. Discordances in the pattern of treatment response were observed, however, between real-world and RCT data for both insulin regimens. For any given baseline HbA concentration, the change in HbA in the RCTs was greater than in real-world conditions and for those with baseline weight above ~60 kg, RCT data showed overall weight gain in contrast to slight weight loss in the real-world population. Lastly, for both randomized controlled trial and real-world populations, while greater baseline weight was associated with reduced response to treatment, the association was much steeper in the RCT than in the real-world population. In addition, greater baseline weight was associated with greater weight reductions in both premixed insulin and basal-bolus insulin regimens, although to a lesser extent with the latter.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight specific discrepancies in the HbA reduction and weight change in insulin regimen between real world versus RCT populations; with greater reduction in HbA and greater increase in weight observed in the RCT population than in the real-world population. Also, the basal-bolus regimens in both real-world and RCT populations showed greater reduction in HbA compared to the premix regimen (though more marked in RCTs), while the premix regimen showed greater increase in weight in real-world, as against basal-bolus in the RCT population.

摘要

目的

评估在 24 周时,与预混胰岛素相比,接受基础-餐时胰岛素方案的 2 型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA)和体重变化的随机对照试验(RCT)数据与真实世界数据的一致性。

方法

系统评价了八项研究的 RCT 数据,这些研究比较了基础-餐时(n=1893)或预混(n=1517)方案。从英国初级保健数据集提取了基础-餐时(n=7483)或预混胰岛素方案(n=10744)的真实世界数据。使用 t 检验计算从基线开始的 HbA 和体重的平均差异,而方差分析用于比较两种治疗方案。线性回归分析用于确定这种变化的预测因素。

结果

两种胰岛素方案均与 HbA 降低(真实世界数据-0.28%;RCT 数据-1.4%)和体重增加(真实世界数据+0.27kg;RCT 数据+2.96kg)相关,但基础-餐时和预混胰岛素之间无显著差异。然而,对于两种胰岛素方案,在真实世界和 RCT 数据之间观察到治疗反应模式存在差异。对于任何特定的基线 HbA 浓度,RCT 中的 HbA 变化大于真实世界条件,对于基线体重超过~60kg 的患者,RCT 数据显示总体体重增加,而真实世界人群则略有体重减轻。最后,对于 RCT 和真实世界人群,尽管基线体重较大与治疗反应降低相关,但这种关联在 RCT 中比在真实世界人群中更为陡峭。此外,基线体重较大与预混胰岛素和基础-餐时胰岛素方案的体重减轻都相关,尽管后者的关联较小。

结论

这些结果突出了真实世界人群与 RCT 人群之间胰岛素方案的 HbA 降低和体重变化之间的特定差异;在 RCT 人群中观察到的 HbA 降低幅度更大,体重增加幅度更大。此外,与预混胰岛素方案相比,在真实世界和 RCT 人群中,基础-餐时方案显示出更大的 HbA 降低,尽管在 RCT 中更为明显,而预混胰岛素方案在真实世界人群中显示出更大的体重增加,而在 RCT 人群中则是基础-餐时方案。

相似文献

1
Premixed vs basal-bolus insulin regimen in Type 2 diabetes: comparison of clinical outcomes from randomized controlled trials and real-world data.预混胰岛素与基础-餐时胰岛素方案治疗 2 型糖尿病的临床结局比较:随机对照试验与真实世界数据比较。
Diabet Med. 2017 Dec;34(12):1728-1736. doi: 10.1111/dme.13518. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
2
Biphasic vs basal bolus insulin regimen in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.2型糖尿病中双相胰岛素与基础追加胰岛素治疗方案的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Diabet Med. 2015 May;32(5):585-94. doi: 10.1111/dme.12694. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
3
Intensification of insulin therapy with basal-bolus or premixed insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.2型糖尿病中基础-餐时胰岛素方案或预混胰岛素方案强化胰岛素治疗:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Endocrine. 2016 Mar;51(3):417-28. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0718-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
4
Comparison between a basal-bolus and a premixed insulin regimen in individuals with type 2 diabetes-results of the GINGER study.基础-餐时胰岛素与预混胰岛素方案治疗 2 型糖尿病的比较——GINGER 研究结果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010 Feb;12(2):115-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01165.x.
5
Personalized intensification of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes - does a basal-bolus regimen suit all patients?2型糖尿病胰岛素治疗的个体化强化——基础-餐时方案适合所有患者吗?
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Aug;32(8):1425-34. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1181051. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
A Real-World, Observational Study of the Initiation, Use, and Effectiveness of Basal-Bolus or Premixed Insulin in Japanese People with Type 2 Diabetes.一项针对日本2型糖尿病患者基础-餐时胰岛素或预混胰岛素起始使用、应用情况及有效性的真实世界观察性研究。
Diabetes Ther. 2021 May;12(5):1341-1357. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01041-x. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Similar glucose control with basal-bolus regimen of insulin detemir plus insulin aspart and thrice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a 50-week randomized clinical trial of stepwise insulin intensification.胰岛素德谷胰岛素和门冬胰岛素基础-餐时方案与预混胰岛素类似,均能有效控制血糖,且在新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者中进行 50 周的强化胰岛素治疗的随机临床试验结果显示,两种方案疗效相当。
Diabetes Metab. 2015 Jun;41(3):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
8
Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: what is the evidence?2 型糖尿病的胰岛素治疗:有哪些证据?
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 May;11(5):415-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00981.x. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
9
Association of diabetic ketoacidosis, severe hypoglycemia and glycemic control among children and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with premixed versus basal-bolus insulin therapy.预混胰岛素与基础-餐时胰岛素治疗儿童和青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病酮症酸中毒、严重低血糖和血糖控制的关系。
Biomed J. 2018 Dec;41(6):348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2018.10.005. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Prandial premixed insulin analogue regimens versus basal insulin analogue regimens in the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based comparison.餐时预混胰岛素类似物方案与基础胰岛素类似物方案治疗2型糖尿病的循证比较
Clin Ther. 2007;29 Spec No:1254-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Insights into clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and adherence challenges.2型糖尿病的胰岛素治疗:临床疗效、患者报告结局及依从性挑战的见解
World J Diabetes. 2024 May 15;15(5):828-852. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i5.828.
2
[Fixed ratio combinations GLP-1RA and basal insulin: literature review].[胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与基础胰岛素的固定比例组合:文献综述]
Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 2024 Feb 28;70(1):91-99. doi: 10.14341/probl13312.
3
Risk Stratification in People with Diabetes for Fasting During Ramadan: Consensus from Arabic Association for the Study of Diabetes and Metabolism.
糖尿病患者在斋月期间禁食的风险分层:阿拉伯糖尿病与代谢研究协会的共识。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;20(7):e201023222409. doi: 10.2174/0115733998249793231005105724.
4
Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms.系统评价论文中的危害 1:危害研究简介。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;143:186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.023. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
5
Comparison of Prevailing Insulin Regimens at Different Time Periods in Hospitalized Patients: A Real-World Experience from a Tertiary Hospital.不同时期住院患者胰岛素治疗方案的比较:来自一家三级医院的真实世界经验。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 May;46(3):439-450. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0065. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
Low fasting glucose-to-estimated average glucose ratio was associated with superior response to insulin degludec/aspart compared with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.空腹血糖与估算的平均血糖比值低与 2 型糖尿病患者对胰岛素德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素的反应优于基础胰岛素有关。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Jan;13(1):85-93. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13634. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
7
A Pragmatic Study of Basal and Mid-Mixture Insulins as Starter Insulins in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Observations From Long-Term, Real-World Experience.基础胰岛素与中效胰岛素混合制剂作为中国2型糖尿病患者起始胰岛素治疗的实用性研究:长期真实世界经验观察
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Mar;12(3):931-941. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01007-z. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
A single-dose euglycaemic clamp study in two cohorts to compare the exposure of SAR341402 (insulin aspart) Mix 70/30 with US- and European-approved versions of insulin aspart Mix 70/30 and SAR341402 rapid-acting solution in subjects with type 1 diabetes.一项在两队列中进行的单次剂量血糖钳夹研究,旨在比较 SAR341402(门冬胰岛素)混合 70/30 制剂与已获美国和欧洲批准的门冬胰岛素混合 70/30 制剂以及 SAR341402 速效溶液在 1 型糖尿病患者中的暴露情况。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Mar;23(3):674-681. doi: 10.1111/dom.14260. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: comparison of results from randomized controlled trials and real-world data.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄:随机对照试验和真实世界数据结果比较。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):346-367. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0288.
10
Favorable Glycemic Control with Once-Daily Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart after Changing from Basal Insulin in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.在 2 型糖尿病成人中从基础胰岛素转换为每日一次德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素后的血糖良好控制。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2019 Dec;34(4):382-389. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2019.34.4.382.