National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy; Department of Economic, Business and Statistical Sciences, University of Palermo, Italy.
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Palermo, Italy.
Respir Med. 2017 Oct;131:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.061. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Despite the widespread use of the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) 2012 reference values, there is still the need of testing their applicability in local areas.
The aims of this study are to evaluate applicability of GLI reference equations in a large population-based sample of normal schoolchildren from Sicily, and to compare GLI and previous prediction equations in terms of spirometry test interpretation.
GLI equations were evaluated in 1243 normal schoolchildren, 49% males, aged 7-16 years, height 116-187 cm. Normality assumptions for the GLI z-scores (FEV, FVC, FEV/FVC) were tested, and bootstrap confidence intervals for the mean (0 expected) and the variance (1 expected) were derived. GLI and other reference equations were compared in terms of probabilities to fall below the lower limit of normal (LLN).
The GLI z-score normality assumption held for males but not for females (p < 0.001). According to the mean z-score, predicted values were: slightly underestimated for FEV (0.15 in males, 0.07 in females); overestimated for FVC (-0.27 in males, -0.32 in females); highly underestimated for FEV/FVC (0.75 in males, 0.81 in females). Variability was correctly estimated. The probability of FEV<LLN correctly approached 0.05 when using GLI, Hankinson and Quanjer equations. Wang equations yielded correct probabilities of abnormal FVC; Pistelli equations yielded correct probabilities of abnormal FEV/FVC for females.
GLI 2012 references underestimate FEV/FVC predicted values in a sample of normal South Italian children. Physicians interpreting spirometry should be aware to test reference values prior to their use in a local area.
尽管广泛使用全球肺功能倡议(GLI)2012 参考值,但仍需要在当地测试其适用性。
本研究旨在评估 GLI 参考方程在西西里岛一个大型基于人群的正常学龄儿童样本中的适用性,并比较 GLI 和以前的预测方程在肺量测定解释方面的差异。
评估了 1243 名正常学龄儿童(49%为男性,年龄 7-16 岁,身高 116-187cm)的 GLI 方程。测试了 GLI z 分数(FEV、FVC、FEV/FVC)的正态性假设,并得出了均值(0 预期)和方差(1 预期)的 bootstrap 置信区间。比较了 GLI 和其他参考方程在低于正常下限(LLN)的概率方面的差异。
GLI z 分数的正态性假设仅适用于男性,而不适用于女性(p<0.001)。根据平均 z 分数,预测值为:FEV 略有低估(男性为 0.15,女性为 0.07);FVC 高估(男性为-0.27,女性为-0.32);FEV/FVC 严重低估(男性为 0.75,女性为 0.81)。变异性得到正确估计。使用 GLI、Hankinson 和 Quanjer 方程时,FEV<LLN 的概率正确接近 0.05。Wang 方程得出了异常 FVC 的正确概率;Pistelli 方程得出了女性异常 FEV/FVC 的正确概率。
GLI 2012 参考值低估了南意大利正常儿童的 FEV/FVC 预测值。在当地使用前,医生应注意测试参考值。