Suppr超能文献

上肢等速肌力训练与慢性脑卒中后被动关节活动度训练的随机对照研究

Upper Limb Isokinetic Strengthening Versus Passive Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France; Euromov, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.490. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the benefit of isokinetic strengthening of the upper limb (UL) in patients with chronic stroke as compared to passive mobilization.

DESIGN

Randomized blinded assessor controlled trial.

SETTING

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation departments of 2 university hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=20) with incomplete hemiplegia (16 men; mean age, 64y; median time since stroke, 32mo).

INTERVENTIONS

A 6-week comprehensive rehabilitation program, 3d/wk, 3 sessions/d. In addition, a 45-minute session per day was performed using an isokinetic dynamometer, with either isokinetic strengthening of elbow and wrist flexors/extensors (isokinetic strengthening group) or passive joint mobilization (control group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was the increase in Upper Limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UL-FMA) score at day 45 (t1). Secondary endpoints were increases in UL-FMA scores, Box and Block Test scores, muscle strength, spasticity, and Barthel Index at t1, t2 (3mo), and t3 (6mo).

RESULTS

Recruitment was stopped early because of excessive fatigue in the isokinetic strengthening group. The increase in UL-FMA score at t1 was 3.5±4.4 in the isokinetic strengthening group versus 6.0±4.5 in the control group (P=.2). Gains in distal UL-FMA scores were larger (3.1±2.8) in the control group versus 0.6±2.5 in the isokinetic strengthening group (P=.05). No significant group difference was observed in secondary endpoints. Mixed models confirmed those results. Regarding the whole sample, gains from baseline were significant for the UL-FMA at t1 (+4.8; P<.001), t2, and t3 and for the Box and Block Test at t1 (+3; P=.013) and t2.

CONCLUSIONS

In a comprehensive rehabilitation program, isokinetic strengthening did not show superiority to passive mobilization for UL rehabilitation. Findings also suggest a sustained benefit in impairments and function of late UL rehabilitation programs for patients with stroke.

摘要

目的

评估与被动活动相比,上肢等速强化训练对慢性脑卒中患者的益处。

设计

随机、双盲、评估者设盲对照试验。

地点

2 所大学医院的物理医学与康复科。

参与者

20 名不完全偏瘫患者(16 名男性;平均年龄 64 岁;中风后中位数时间 32 个月)。

干预

每周 3 天,每天 3 次,共 6 周的综合康复计划。此外,每天进行 45 分钟的等速测力计治疗,分别采用肘关节和腕关节屈肌/伸肌的等速强化训练(等速强化组)或被动关节活动(对照组)。

主要观察指标

主要终点是第 45 天(t1)上肢 Fugl-Meyer 评估(UL-FMA)评分的增加。次要终点是 t1、t2(3 个月)和 t3(6 个月)时 UL-FMA 评分、Box 和 Block 测试评分、肌肉力量、痉挛和 Barthel 指数的增加。

结果

由于等速强化组患者过度疲劳,提前停止了招募。等速强化组 t1 时 UL-FMA 评分增加 3.5±4.4,对照组增加 6.0±4.5(P=.2)。对照组远端 UL-FMA 评分增加(3.1±2.8)大于等速强化组(0.6±2.5)(P=.05)。次要终点无显著组间差异。混合模型证实了这些结果。对于整个样本,t1、t2 和 t3 时 UL-FMA 以及 t1 时 Box 和 Block 测试的基线增益均显著(UL-FMA 分别增加 4.8;P<.001、3;P=.013)。

结论

在综合康复计划中,与被动活动相比,等速强化训练对上肢康复没有优势。研究结果还表明,对于中风后患者,上肢康复的晚期康复计划在损伤和功能方面仍有持续获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验