Tang Xiaodong, Guo Wei, Yang Rongli, Yan Taiqiang, Tang Shun, Li Dasen
Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):3060-3070. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5505-4. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Pelvic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection is technically difficult and characterized by a high complication rate. Although endoprosthetic replacement can result in immediate postoperative functional recovery, biologic reconstructions with autograft may provide an enhanced prognosis in patients with long-term survival; however, little has been published regarding this approach. We therefore wished to evaluate whether whole-bulk femoral head autograft that is not contaminated by tumor can be used to reconstruct segmental bone defects after intraarticular resection of periacetabular tumors.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a pilot study, we evaluated (1) local tumor control, (2) complications, and (3) postoperative function as measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score.
Between 2009 and 2015, we treated 13 patients with periacetabular malignant or aggressive benign tumors with en bloc resection, bulk femoral head autograft, and cemented THA (with or without a titanium acetabular reconstruction cup), and all were included for analysis here. During that time, the general indications for this approach were (1) patients anticipated to have a good oncologic prognosis and adequate surgical margins to allow this approach, (2) patients whose pelvic bone defects did not exceed two types (Types I + II or Types II + III as defined by Enneking and Dunham), and (3) patients whose medical insurance would not cover what otherwise might have been a pelvic tumor prosthesis. During this period, another 91 patients were treated with pelvic prosthetic replacement, which was our preferred approach. Median followup in this study was 36 months (range, 24-99 months among surviving patients; one patient died 8 months after surgery); no patients were lost to followup. Bone defects were Types II + III in five patients, and Types I + II in eight. After intraarticular resection, ipsilateral femoral head autograft combined with THA was used to reconstruct the segmental bone defect of the acetabulum. In patients with Types I + II resections, the connection between the sacrum and the acetabulum was reestablished with a fibular autograft or a titanium cage filled with dried bone-allograft particles which was enhanced by using a pedicle screw and rod system. Functional evaluation was done in 11 patients who remained alive and maintained the femoral head autograft at final followup; one other patient received secondary resection involving removal of the femoral head autograft and internal fixation, and was excluded from functional evaluation. Endpoints were assessed by chart review.
Two patients experienced local tumor recurrence. Finally, eight patients did not show signs of the disease, one patient died of disease for local and distant tumor relapse, and four patients survived, but still had the disease. Three of these four patients had distant metastases without local recurrence and one had local control after secondary resection but still experienced system relapse. We observed the following complications: hematoma (one patient; treated surgically with hematoma clearance), delayed wound healing (one patient; treated by débridement), deep vein thrombosis (one patient), and hip dislocation (one patient; treated with open reduction). The median 1993 Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 83% (25 of 30 points; range, 19-29 points), and all patients were community ambulators; one used a cane, three used a walker, and nine did not use any assistive devices.
In this small series at short-term followup, we found that reconstruction of segmental bone defects after intraarticular resection of periacetabular tumors with femoral head autograft does not appear to impede local tumor control; complications were in the range of what might be expected in a series of large pelvic reconstructions, and postoperative function was generally good.
Level IV, therapeutic study.
髋臼周围肿瘤切除术后的骨盆重建技术难度大,且并发症发生率高。尽管假体置换可使患者术后功能立即恢复,但自体骨移植的生物学重建可能会改善长期存活患者的预后;然而,关于这种方法的报道很少。因此,我们希望评估未受肿瘤污染的整块股骨头自体骨能否用于髋臼周围肿瘤关节内切除术后节段性骨缺损的重建。
问题/目的:在一项初步研究中,我们评估了(1)局部肿瘤控制情况、(2)并发症以及(3)采用肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会(Musculoskeletal Tumor Society)评分衡量的术后功能。
2009年至2015年期间,我们对13例髋臼周围恶性或侵袭性良性肿瘤患者进行了整块切除、大块股骨头自体骨移植以及骨水泥型全髋关节置换术(使用或不使用钛髋臼重建杯),所有患者均纳入本分析。在此期间,该方法的一般适应证为:(1)预计肿瘤学预后良好且手术切缘足够允许采用此方法的患者;(2)骨盆骨缺损不超过两种类型(按照Enneking和Dunham的定义为I + II型或II + III型)的患者;(3)医疗保险不涵盖骨盆肿瘤假体的患者。在此期间,另外91例患者接受了骨盆假体置换,这是我们首选的方法。本研究的中位随访时间为36个月(存活患者的随访时间范围为24 - 99个月;1例患者术后8个月死亡);无患者失访。5例患者的骨缺损为II + III型,8例为I + II型。关节内切除术后,采用同侧股骨头自体骨移植联合全髋关节置换术重建髋臼节段性骨缺损。对于I + II型切除的患者,采用腓骨自体骨或填充有冻干同种异体骨颗粒的钛笼,并使用椎弓根螺钉和棒系统加强,重建骶骨与髋臼之间的连接。对11例存活且在末次随访时保留股骨头自体骨的患者进行了功能评估;另1例患者接受了包括切除股骨头自体骨和内固定的二次手术,被排除在功能评估之外。通过查阅病历评估终点指标。
2例患者出现局部肿瘤复发。最终,8例患者无疾病迹象,1例患者因局部和远处肿瘤复发死于疾病,4例患者存活但仍患有疾病。这4例患者中,3例有远处转移但无局部复发,1例二次切除后局部得到控制但仍出现全身复发。我们观察到以下并发症:血肿(1例患者;通过手术清除血肿治疗)、伤口愈合延迟(1例患者;通过清创治疗)、深静脉血栓形成(1例患者)以及髋关节脱位(1例患者;通过切开复位治疗)。1993年肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分的中位数为83%(30分中的25分;范围为19 - 29分),所有患者均能在社区行走;1例使用手杖,3例使用助行器,9例未使用任何辅助装置。
在这个短期随访的小样本系列研究中,我们发现采用股骨头自体骨重建髋臼周围肿瘤关节内切除术后的节段性骨缺损似乎并不妨碍局部肿瘤控制;并发症在一系列大型骨盆重建中预期的范围内,且术后功能总体良好。
IV级,治疗性研究。