Schapkaitz Elise, Khoza Phoyisile
Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, University of Witwatersrand Medical School, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 May;32(4):e22335. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22335. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
Automated hematology analyzers generate white blood cell (WBC) suspect flags to indicate smears requiring manual review. In a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patient population with a high frequency of abnormal specimens, the usefulness of these flags depends on their sensitivity and specificity. The white cell precursor (WPC) channel on the Sysmex XN-9000 analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) has recently been introduced in order to distinguish immature cells such as blasts and abnormal lymphocytes.
The efficiency of the flags generated by WPC reflex testing was compared to the white cell differential (WDF) on the Sysmex XN-9000 in 400 routine HIV samples.
A flag was generated by the WDF channel in 346 (86.50%) samples. Addition of the WPC to the WDF resulted in a 20.99% reduction in the smear review rate. WPC analysis correctly identified the initial WDF flag in 59 (60.82%) samples with 'blasts?' or 'abnormal lympho?' flags. WPC showed an excellent sensitivity of 100%. However, the specificity remained poor. On investigation, samples with chronic infection/inflammation (35.00%) and lymphopenia (63.25%) were associated with a high false positive rate of 76.32% and 55.56%, respectively. WPC analysis removed 45 (51.72%) coexisting 'atypical lympho?' false positive WDF flags. The 'atypical lympho?' flag showed an increased sensitivity and specificity of 88.46% and 74.67%, respectively.
White cell precursor reflex testing showed improved flagging efficiency for the 'atypical lympho?' flag, which was a good indicator of reactive lymphocytes during chronic infection/inflammation. Nevertheless, the false positive rate for 'abnormal lympho/blasts?' was high in the presence of lymphopenia and infection.
自动化血液分析仪会生成白细胞(WBC)可疑标记,以指示需要人工复查的涂片。在异常标本发生率较高的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)患者群体中,这些标记的有用性取决于其敏感性和特异性。Sysmex XN - 9000分析仪(Sysmex公司,日本神户)上的白细胞前体(WPC)通道最近已被引入,用于区分原始细胞和异常淋巴细胞等未成熟细胞。
在400份常规HIV样本中,将WPC反射测试生成的标记效率与Sysmex XN - 9000上的白细胞分类(WDF)进行比较。
WDF通道在346份(86.50%)样本中生成了标记。在WDF基础上增加WPC后,涂片复查率降低了20.99%。WPC分析在59份(60.82%)带有“原始细胞?”或“异常淋巴细胞?”标记的样本中正确识别出了最初的WDF标记。WPC显示出100%的出色敏感性。然而,特异性仍然较差。经调查,慢性感染/炎症样本(35.00%)和淋巴细胞减少样本(63.25%)的假阳性率分别高达76.32%和55.56%。WPC分析去除了45份(51.72%)共存的“非典型淋巴细胞?”假阳性WDF标记。“非典型淋巴细胞?”标记的敏感性和特异性分别提高到了88.46%和74.67%。
白细胞前体反射测试显示“非典型淋巴细胞?”标记的标记效率有所提高,这是慢性感染/炎症期间反应性淋巴细胞的良好指标。然而,在存在淋巴细胞减少和感染的情况下,“异常淋巴细胞/原始细胞?”的假阳性率较高。