Cabaleiro-Lago E M, Rodríguez-Otero J, Carrazana-García J A
Facultade de Ciencias (Dpto. de Química Física), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus de Lugo. Avda. Alfonso X El Sabio s/n, 27002 Lugo, Galicia, Spain.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017 Oct 11;19(39):26787-26798. doi: 10.1039/c7cp03665e.
The complexation of the pristine fullerenes C60 and C70 and the endohedral fullerenes Sc3N@C80 and Sc3N@C68 has been tested using a series of hosts of different nature, including the buckybowls corannulene and sumanene, a zinc porphyrin, a chloro boron subphthalocyanine, and a corannulene pentasubstituted with nitrile groups. A systematic theoretical study has been carried out in order to explore both the strength of the interaction and the feasibility for electron transfer of the dimers. Dispersion is the main stabilizing contribution in these dimers, so both molecules orientate so as to maximize the number of close contacts among atoms. As a consequence, all host molecules interact with C70 by the long axis. C60 and Sc3N@C80 are more spherically shaped, so there is no clear preference for the position of the host molecule, though endohedral fullerenes are encapsulated preferentially by the face without contacts with the inner cluster. Complexation energies increase with the contact surface between molecules in the complex. The most stable complexes with fullerenes are formed by the subphthalocyanine and the CN-pentasubstituted corannulene. Depending on the dimer, complexation energies span from around -15 kcal mol of C60 with corannulene to -24 kcal mol of Sc3N@C80 with the subphthalocyanine. Some of the dimers seem to be capable of acting as a donor-acceptor pair, leading to charge transfer states with a neat separation of charge, thus being candidates for organic photovoltaic devices. Endohedral fullerenes are less prone to these donor-acceptor transitions, with charge transfer taking place from the carbon cage to the endohedral cluster. cora5CN, with its inverted polarity, also shows charge transfer upon excitation but with the fullerene acting as a donor and the buckybowl as an acceptor.
已使用一系列不同性质的主体对原始富勒烯C60和C70以及内嵌富勒烯Sc3N@C80和Sc3N@C68的络合作用进行了测试,这些主体包括巴基碗状的碗烯和苏曼烯、锌卟啉、氯代硼亚酞菁以及腈基五取代的碗烯。为了探究二聚体相互作用的强度以及电子转移的可行性,开展了一项系统的理论研究。色散作用是这些二聚体中主要的稳定贡献,因此两个分子会进行取向,以使原子间的紧密接触数量最大化。结果,所有主体分子都通过长轴与C70相互作用。C60和Sc3N@C80的形状更接近球形,因此主体分子的位置没有明显偏好,不过内嵌富勒烯优先被不与内部簇接触的面所包裹。络合能随络合物中分子间的接触面积增加而增大。与富勒烯形成的最稳定络合物是由亚酞菁和腈基五取代的碗烯形成的。根据二聚体的不同,络合能范围从碗烯与C60形成的约 -15 kcal/mol到亚酞菁与Sc3N@C80形成的 -24 kcal/mol。一些二聚体似乎能够作为供体 - 受体对,导致电荷转移态且电荷有清晰的分离,因此有望用于有机光伏器件。内嵌富勒烯较不容易发生这些供体 - 受体跃迁,电荷转移发生在从碳笼到内嵌簇之间。具有相反极性的cora5CN在激发时也会发生电荷转移,但此时富勒烯作为供体,巴基碗作为受体。