Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, USA.
Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, 78666, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2018 Jan;28(1):135-148. doi: 10.1002/eap.1634. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
Increased market viability of harvest residues as forest bioenergy feedstock may escalate removal of coarse woody debris in managed forests. Meanwhile, many forest invertebrates use coarse woody debris for cover, food, and reproduction. Few studies have explicitly addressed effects of operational-scale woody biomass harvesting on invertebrates following clearcutting. Therefore, we measured invertebrate community response to large-scale harvest residue removal and micro-site manipulations of harvest residue availability in recently clearcut, intensively managed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) forests in North Carolina (NC; n = 4) and Georgia (GA; n = 4), USA. We captured 39,794 surface-active invertebrates representing 171 taxonomic groups using pitfall traps situated among micro-site locations (i.e., purposefully retained piles of hardwood stems and piles of conifer stems and areas without coarse woody debris in NC; windrows and no windrows in GA). Micro-site locations were located within six, large-scale treatments (7.16-14.3 ha) in clearcuts. Large-scale treatments represented intensive harvest residue removal, 15% and 30% harvest residue retention, and no harvest residue removal. In NC, ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) were three times more abundant in treatments with no harvest residue removal than those with the most intensive harvest residue removal and were reduced in treatments that retained 15% or 30% of harvest residues, although not significantly. Invertebrate taxa richness was greater at micro-site locations with retained hardwood and pine (Pinus spp.) harvest residues than those with minimal amounts of coarse woody debris. In both states, relative abundances of several invertebrate taxa, including cave crickets (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae), fungus gnats (Diptera: Mycetophilidae and Sciaridae), millipedes (Diplopoda), and wood roaches (Blattodea: Ectobiidae), were greater at micro-site locations with retained harvest residues than those with minimal coarse woody debris. Intensified woody biomass harvesting without retention of ≥15% of harvest residue volume may reduce invertebrate taxa richness and abundances of some key invertebrate taxa in regenerating stands. Further, harvest residue management during and after woody biomass harvesting may be an important consideration for maintaining invertebrate diversity and conserving invertebrates that are influential in the maintenance of ecosystem function and integrity in young forests.
作为森林生物能源的收获残留物的市场生存能力增加,可能会加剧管理森林中粗木质残体的去除。同时,许多森林无脊椎动物利用粗木质残体作为庇护所、食物和繁殖地。很少有研究明确解决过作业规模的木质生物质收获对皆伐后无脊椎动物的影响。因此,我们在美国北卡罗来纳州(NC;n=4)和佐治亚州(GA;n=4)的最近皆伐的、集约化管理的火炬松(Pinus taeda)林中,测量了大规模收获残留物去除和收获残留物可用性的微生境操作对无脊椎动物群落的影响。我们使用陷阱在微生境位置(即在 NC 中故意保留的硬木原木堆和松原木堆以及没有粗木质残体的区域;在 GA 中则是windrows 和无 windrows)之间捕获了 39794 个表面活性无脊椎动物,代表了 171 个分类群。微生境位置位于六个大型处理区内(7.16-14.3 公顷)。大型处理区代表了密集的收获残留物去除、15%和 30%的收获残留物保留以及没有收获残留物去除。在 NC 中,地面甲虫(鞘翅目:Carabidae)和蟋蟀(直翅目:Gryllidae)在没有收获残留物去除的处理区比最密集的收获残留物去除处理区丰富三倍,而在保留 15%或 30%收获残留物的处理区中则减少了,尽管没有显著减少。在保留硬木和松树(松属)收获残留物的微生境位置上,无脊椎动物的丰富度大于那些粗木质残体含量最低的微生境位置。在两个州,在保留收获残留物的微生境位置上,相对丰度较高的几种无脊椎动物包括洞穴蟋蟀(直翅目:Rhaphidophoridae)、菌蝇(双翅目:Mycetophilidae 和 Sciaridae)、千足虫(多足纲)和木蟑螂(蜚蠊目:Ectobiidae),而在粗木质残体含量最低的微生境位置上则较少。在没有保留≥15%收获残留物体积的情况下,加强木质生物质收获可能会降低再生林的无脊椎动物丰富度和某些关键无脊椎动物类群的丰度。此外,在木质生物质收获期间和之后的收获残留物管理可能是维持无脊椎动物多样性和保护对维护生态系统功能和完整性有影响的无脊椎动物的重要考虑因素。