Longeard Pauline, Santonja Mathieu, Morandini Fréderic, Gibernau Marc, Nadarajah Sugahendni, Belliard Pauline, Feignier Nathalie, Massaiu Antonella, Andrei-Ruiz Marie-Cécile, Ferrat Lila
UMR CNRS 6134, Sciences Pour l'Environnement University of Corsica Corte France.
Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE Marseille France.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Sep 13;14(9):e70141. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70141. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Wildfire pressure involves today to implement silvicultural practices that provide a good compromise between reducing fire risk and maintaining ecological functioning. Thinning reduces tree density and low branches, but results in the deposition of a considerable biomass of woody debris on the ground (up to 4800 g m in this study). They can be eliminated by prescribed burning, but this raises questions about the fire intensity that can be generated and the impact on soil fauna. We undertook the monitoring of a thinning and prescribed burning operation, separated and combined, in November 2020, in a stand prone to fire risk, located in Bavella, Corsica. Fuel load was determined, and temperature measurements in the soil were performed using K-type thermocouples. Soil arthropod populations were monitored using pitfall traps, in particular Collembola, Acari, Aranae, and Coleoptera. The combination of thinning and burning resulted in a fire intensity of 75.8 versus 8.4 kW m for burning alone. Maximum temperature rise measured at -2 cm below the surface was less than 5°C for both treatments. The combination of thinning and burning did not result in higher fire intensity at ground level than burning alone, and the soil showed high insulation capacity. Most of the woody debris that burned was small-diameter, and large-diameter debris remained unconsumed. This burning, performed during a period of low biological activity, had no effect on soil arthropods, and the presence of large debris may have provided refuge areas. Collembola group was the faster to recover, and were followed by cohorts of predators in summer, especially Acari. Our results suggest that a combination of burning and thinning in autumn may be beneficial for fire prevention. However, the decomposition of woody debris in relation to fire risk, and the occurrence of pests after these treatments need to be monitored.
当前,野火压力要求实施造林措施,以便在降低火灾风险和维持生态功能之间达成良好平衡。间伐可降低树木密度和低分支,但会导致大量木质残体沉积在地面(本研究中高达4800克/平方米)。这些残体可通过计划烧除来清除,但这引发了关于可能产生的火灾强度以及对土壤动物影响的问题。2020年11月,我们在科西嘉岛巴韦拉一个易发生火灾风险的林分中,对间伐和计划烧除单独及联合操作进行了监测。测定了燃料载量,并使用K型热电偶进行土壤温度测量。使用陷阱诱捕器监测土壤节肢动物种群,特别是弹尾目、蜱螨目、蜘蛛目和鞘翅目。间伐和烧除相结合导致的火灾强度为75.8千瓦/米,而单独烧除为8.4千瓦/米。两种处理在地表以下2厘米处测得的最高温度升高均小于5℃。间伐和烧除相结合在地面产生的火灾强度并不比单独烧除高,且土壤显示出高隔热能力。燃烧的大部分木质残体为小径材,大径材残体未被消耗。这次在生物活动低的时期进行的烧除对土壤节肢动物没有影响,大残体的存在可能提供了避难区域。弹尾目群体恢复最快,夏季捕食者群体随后恢复,尤其是蜱螨目。我们的结果表明,秋季烧除和间伐相结合可能有利于防火。然而,需要监测木质残体分解与火灾风险的关系以及这些处理后害虫的发生情况。