文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

SB5(阿达木单抗生物类似药)与阿达木单抗参照药治疗中重度类风湿关节炎的 III 期随机研究

Phase III Randomized Study of SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, Versus Reference Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;70(1):40-48. doi: 10.1002/art.40336. Epub 2017 Nov 21.


DOI:10.1002/art.40336
PMID:28950421
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5765475/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: SB5 is a biosimilar agent for adalimumab (ADA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of SB5 in comparison with reference ADA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with moderately to severely active RA despite treatment with methotrexate were randomized 1:1 to receive SB5 or reference ADA at a dosage of 40 mg subcutaneously every other week. The primary efficacy end point was the response rate based on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 24 in the per-protocol set (completer analysis). Additional end points included efficacy, PK, safety, and immunogenicity assessments. RESULTS: Of the 544 patients randomized to receive a study drug, the full analysis set comprised 542 patients (269 in the SB5 group, 273 in the reference ADA group) and the per-protocol set comprised 476 patients (239 receiving SB5, 237 receiving reference ADA). The ACR20 response rate at week 24 in the per-protocol set was equivalent between those receiving SB5 and those receiving reference ADA (72.4% and 72.2%, respectively); the difference in the ACR20 response rate (0.1%, [95% confidence interval -7.83%, 8.13%]) was within the predefined equivalence margin (±15%). Similar results were seen in the full analysis set (missing data being considered a nonresponse). The SB5 and reference ADA treatment groups were comparable across other end points, including the ACR 50% and ACR 70% improvement response rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, PK data, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, and the antidrug antibody response. Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy and safety of SB5 and reference ADA were comparable regardless of antidrug antibody status. CONCLUSION: The ACR20 response rate at week 24 was equivalent between patients treated with the biosimilar agent SB5 and those treated with reference ADA. SB5 and reference ADA were both well tolerated, with comparable safety profiles, in patients with RA.

摘要

目的:SB5 是一种阿达木单抗(ADA)的生物类似药。本研究旨在评估 SB5 与参照 ADA 相比在接受甲氨蝶呤治疗后仍处于中度至重度活跃期的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效、药代动力学(PK)、安全性和免疫原性。

方法:在这项 III 期、随机、双盲、平行组研究中,接受过甲氨蝶呤治疗但病情仍处于中度至重度活跃期的 RA 患者按 1:1 随机分配,接受 SB5 或参照 ADA 治疗,剂量为每两周皮下注射 40mg。主要疗效终点为意向治疗人群(完全分析集)中第 24 周基于美国风湿病学会 20%改善标准(ACR20)的应答率。其他终点包括疗效、PK、安全性和免疫原性评估。

结果:在接受研究药物治疗的 544 名患者中,全分析集包括 542 名患者(SB5 组 269 名,参照 ADA 组 273 名),符合方案集包括 476 名患者(SB5 组 239 名,参照 ADA 组 237 名)。符合方案集患者第 24 周时的 ACR20 应答率在 SB5 组和参照 ADA 组之间相当(分别为 72.4%和 72.2%);ACR20 应答率的差异(0.1%,95%置信区间 -7.83%,8.13%)在预设的等效边界内(±15%)。在全分析集中也观察到类似的结果(将缺失数据视为无应答)。SB5 和参照 ADA 治疗组在其他终点方面相似,包括 ACR50%和 ACR70%的改善应答率、基于红细胞沉降率的 28 个关节疾病活动度评分、PK 数据、治疗中出现的不良事件发生率和抗药物抗体反应。亚组分析显示,无论是否存在抗药物抗体,SB5 和参照 ADA 的疗效和安全性均相当。

结论:接受生物类似药 SB5 治疗的患者和接受参照 ADA 治疗的患者在第 24 周时的 ACR20 应答率相当。SB5 和参照 ADA 在 RA 患者中均具有良好的耐受性,安全性相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/3e3b1820074b/ART-70-40-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/fd21018495dc/ART-70-40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/4f96d1dbdd79/ART-70-40-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/a2a24c211232/ART-70-40-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/3e3b1820074b/ART-70-40-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/fd21018495dc/ART-70-40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/4f96d1dbdd79/ART-70-40-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/a2a24c211232/ART-70-40-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd58/5765475/3e3b1820074b/ART-70-40-g004.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Phase III Randomized Study of SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, Versus Reference Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017-11-21

[2]
Switching From Reference Adalimumab to SB5 (Adalimumab Biosimilar) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Fifty-Two-Week Phase III Randomized Study Results.

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018-4-24

[3]
FKB327, an adalimumab biosimilar, versus the reference product: results of a randomized, Phase III, double-blind study, and its open-label extension.

Arthritis Res Ther. 2019-12-12

[4]
A randomised, double-blind, phase III study comparing SB2, an infliximab biosimilar, to the infliximab reference product Remicade in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2017-1

[5]
Similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of adalimumab biosimilar BI 695501 and Humira reference product in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the phase III randomised VOLTAIRE-RA equivalence study.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2018-3-7

[6]
A randomized controlled trial comparing PF-06438179/GP1111 (an infliximab biosimilar) and infliximab reference product for treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.

Arthritis Res Ther. 2018-7-27

[7]
A comparative clinical study of PF-06410293, a candidate adalimumab biosimilar, and adalimumab reference product (Humira®) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis.

Arthritis Res Ther. 2018-8-15

[8]
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, active controlled study to compare efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (Exemptia; ZRC-3197) and adalimumab (Humira) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Int J Rheum Dis. 2016-11

[9]
Safety of adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (acetate-buffered formulation) in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis.

Clin Rheumatol. 2019-8-8

[10]
SB5: An Adalimumab Biosimilar.

BioDrugs. 2018-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
Biosimilars for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis.

Psoriasis (Auckl). 2025-8-18

[2]
Switch acceptance and persistence of adalimumab biosimilars in IBD patients: a prospective observational study.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025-4-23

[3]
The Path to Accessible Care: Development and Impact of Eculizumab Biosimilars for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.

BioDrugs. 2025-3

[4]
Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Biosimilar Adalimumab Advixa® Compared With Reference Product Humira® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Bangladesh.

Cureus. 2025-1-18

[5]
Possibilities and Limitations in Substituting anti-Drug Antibody Titers with Signal-to-Noise Ratios: A Comprehensive Comparison Using Two Clinical Trial Datasets of Adalimumab.

AAPS J. 2024-11-19

[6]
Counting the costs: a nationwide study on healthcare use following an adalimumab biosimilar switch in >1300 inflammatory arthritis patients.

Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024-10-16

[7]
Real-World Evidence of Clinical Outcomes of the Use of the Adalimumab Biosimilar SB5 in Rheumatic and Gastrointestinal Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: 12-Month Data from the PERFUSE Study.

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024-12

[8]
Anti-TNFα in inflammatory bowel disease: from originators to biosimilars.

Front Pharmacol. 2024-7-24

[9]
Persistence and safety of anti-TNF biosimilars versus originators in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: an observational study on the French National Health Data System.

RMD Open. 2024-3-6

[10]
Effect of treatment with original or biosimilar adalimumab on SARS-CoV2 vaccination antibody titers.

Int J Pharm X. 2024-1-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2017-10

[2]
The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2016-6

[3]
Key design considerations on comparative clinical efficacy studies for biosimilars: adalimumab as an example.

RMD Open. 2016-2-5

[4]
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, active controlled study to compare efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (Exemptia; ZRC-3197) and adalimumab (Humira) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Int J Rheum Dis. 2016-11

[5]
A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2017-1

[6]
Biosimilars: a cure to the U.S. health care cost conundrum?

Blood Rev. 2014-11

[7]
Assessment and reporting of the clinical immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins and peptides-harmonized terminology and tactical recommendations.

AAPS J. 2014-4-24

[8]
Significant associations of antidrug antibody levels with serum drug trough levels and therapeutic response of adalimumab and etanercept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2014-1-17

[9]
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2013-10-25

[10]
2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索